When I got this parted-out cat, the boom was missing, and I went thru the trouble making a copy of the original boom. P18-2s use a square section aluminum tube with a complicated inside outhaul system.
My simplified outhaul system is 2:1, which is not optimal.
Also, I could only get an aluminum tube which has sharp edges instead of a slight radius.
Two things: I chamfered the edge slightly, but the stress from the outhaul car pulling upward when under sail finally caused one edge to crack. it still holds up, but it will have to be repaired.
Also, someone pointed out that square booms are quite a bit more dangerous than round ones when they hit you on the head, which they all eventually will.
I'd prefer to make a round boom this time (I cannot import a second hand one here at reasonable cost). It is possible to get a round aluminum tube.
Does anyone have any suggestions for the outhaul system? Pics, measurements perhaps?
Thanks,
Dan
edited by: catdan, Apr 25, 2010 - 04:50 AM
New boom for a Prindle 18-2
-
- Rank: Lubber
- Registered: Jul 25, 2008
- Last visit: Aug 10, 2010
- Posts: 91
Posted: Apr 25, 2010 - 05:49 AM
-
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Aug 22, 2007
- Last visit: Jan 07, 2015
- Posts: 742
Posted: Apr 25, 2010 - 12:49 PM
What wall thickness did you use? I made a round one for my 5.2 w/ a 4:1 internal outhaul.
--
Rob
OKC
Pile of Nacra parts..
-- -
- Rank: Lubber
- Registered: Jul 25, 2008
- Last visit: Aug 10, 2010
- Posts: 91
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 01:54 AM
Not sure about the wall thickness of the available tubes, but my best guess is they are 2.0 to 2.5 mm. In any case strong enough when the profile is round.
Would you have any schematics or pics by chance?
Thanks,
Dan -
- Rank: Master Chief
- Registered: Jun 20, 2006
- Last visit: May 22, 2024
- Posts: 7089
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 11:15 AM
i like how the new Vipers outhaul works....
-
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Aug 22, 2007
- Last visit: Jan 07, 2015
- Posts: 742
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 11:37 AM
I like that style as well, however, with a 5.2 (and most older cats I assume) the main isn't high enough aspect to attach the blocks directly to it, specifically the foot is too long. The boom essentially is used for outhaul and mast rotation in that set up, but it seemed like with the longer foot the 7:1 on the blocks would be working against the 2:1 clamcleat on the rotator limiter...which wouldn't end well.
I haven't tried mine yet (project from this winter) but I'm almost certain that the 065 wall isn't enough metal. Since the blocks are attached to the boom and not the sail, the tube needs some rigidity, and it's just too flexible. Remaking it with 125 will cost about $22 and take 3 or 4 hours, so not a big deal, and it will still come in at 2/3rd the weight of the original...I just want to test the current one in light air before starting over.
--
Rob
OKC
Pile of Nacra parts..
-- -
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Aug 22, 2007
- Last visit: Jan 07, 2015
- Posts: 742
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 11:58 AM
To clarify, I assume that on the modern cats the boom is used mostly for outhaul and mast rotation. I don't have one so I could easily be wrong. Here are pics of my tinkering..
I didn't use the basic 29mm harken in this pic.
--
Rob
OKC
Pile of Nacra parts..
-- -
- Rank: Administrator
- Registered: Jul 19, 2001
- Last visit: Nov 15, 2024
- Posts: 3446
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 01:52 PM
It seems that all the modern boats use some form of that approach, where the main blocks pull directly on the main sail and not on the boom at all.
I looked at building a new lighter boom for my Hobie 18 using these updated principles but found that the new boats main clew was positioned directly above the main traveler track so the pull from the main blocks was straight down.
But on a Hobie 18 the foot of the main extends well behind the boat, so the blocks must pull on the boom, requiring a very beefy boom.
It's genius really, where sailboats have pretty much always connected the main blocks to the boom, connecting directly to the clew means you can use a tiny boom saving weight and maybe a sailors head.
Added:
I should learn to read the whole thread before typing, since I just repeated a lot of what Rob said!
--
Damon Linkous
1992 Hobie 18
Memphis, TN
How To Create Your Signature
How To Create Your Own Cool Avatar
How To Display Pictures In The Forums.
-- -
- Rank: Chief
- Registered: Jun 24, 2009
- Last visit: Jun 15, 2023
- Posts: 1555
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 07:53 PM
Hey Rob,
I was looking at doing something similar to my 5.2. What do you think about using an old sailboard mast for a boom? I have a couple of these kicking around, they aren't the super thin light ones they use these days, but mid 80's carbon fiber overbuilt ones. It would reduce some weight and make less of a dent in my head if it made contact.
Do you have some closeups of the outhaul system you put together? How did you get 4:1 internally? i.e. what type of blocks did you use inside? That is definitely a project I would like to try out myself!!
--
Dave Bonin
1981 Nacra 5.2 "Lucile"
1986 Nacra 5.7 "Belle"
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
-- -
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Aug 22, 2007
- Last visit: Jan 07, 2015
- Posts: 742
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 11:03 PM
I spliced two dyneema lines to the ronstan 20mms, with one luggage tagged to the snap shackle for the outhaul. Those two cascade, with a 3/16 sta-set line running through the last one and out through a thru-deck to the cleat. I can't really take a picture b/c its inside the tube. The outhaul actually runs very smoothly. I was a bit concerned about the soft shackles sliding well under load, but that doesn't so far seem to be the case.
I have a notepad with the drawing I used to make it laying around somewhere...unfortunately I have more projects than sense and all the stacks of notes I CAN find don't seem to be related to this project.
The trickiest part is probably the thru-deck in the center, since it has to go in after the two blocks with a line running through it. The 1.5" tube leaves zero extra room to work with lines around the blocks. It all has to slide in in place.
The thru decks fasten to the INSIDE not the outside, so they are a little tougher than they look at first glance, but a little patience and LOTS of string got it done.
I also takes a little planning to make sure that the paths traveled by the blocks don't interfere with the backs of the blind rivets...I mostly got lucky in this regard.
The thick ring at the back of the boom looks nice, but it was a total accident and made it a bit tougher to manipulate the rear thru-deck block. I was trying to test fit my fittings (had a few chunks of aluminum machined, was an excellent idea) and accidentally press-fit one. About 15 minutes of sawing later and I had a smooth little ring on the inside, and a shorter fitting.
--
Rob
OKC
Pile of Nacra parts..
-- -
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Aug 22, 2007
- Last visit: Jan 07, 2015
- Posts: 742
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 11:31 PM
Here's the drawing I went off of. I'm fairly certain that the dimensions and scale bear no relation to reality.
If there's a section of it you'd like a close-up on let me know. That might be more helpful than anything else.
--
Rob
OKC
Pile of Nacra parts..
-- -
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Aug 22, 2007
- Last visit: Jan 07, 2015
- Posts: 742
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 11:34 PM
Again, though, I'm pretty sure the 065 is too thin. I'm planning to have to redo it with 125. I have no idea if any old carbon tube would work or not.
--
Rob
OKC
Pile of Nacra parts..
-- -
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Aug 22, 2007
- Last visit: Jan 07, 2015
- Posts: 742
Posted: Apr 26, 2010 - 11:55 PM
Here's the machined cap:
The shop that did them for me charges $45/hour or something like that, but this was a small enough job that I don't think it cost anything, but the dimensions came out a touch off, too...still got more than I paid for. I had to chuck the one I used in my drill press and wrap the belt from my belt sander around it. Took about 10 minutes of sanding to get what I wanted off of it. You can see the other one I sanded down and tried to test fit. Oops.
--
Rob
OKC
Pile of Nacra parts..
-- -
- Rank: Lubber
- Registered: Jul 25, 2008
- Last visit: Aug 10, 2010
- Posts: 91
Posted: Apr 30, 2010 - 04:58 AM
Has anyone ever made a boom in polyester/fiberglass? -
- Rank: Mate
- Registered: Feb 19, 2008
- Last visit: Aug 26, 2023
- Posts: 671
Posted: Apr 30, 2010 - 06:34 AM
making 1 out of polyester frb means you might as well use an old windsurfer mast
i too have been thinking of lightening my 5.2 somehow and the boom is 1 of the easiest areas to trackle
though i also wanted a bit of carbon bling visible by using an old carbon fiber windsurfer mast. have a bit of 1 ogf those acting as my tramp tube at the moment
another good saving would be swapping out the rudders and daggers for the almost identically sized but half the weight, weta tri dagger and rudders
but pricey
stood on the scales the other day just before putting up the 5.2's mast. fully rigged with diamonds, stays, halyards, trap wires etc. it was just under 30kg, wish i could get an old mastrom carbon tornado mast from somewhere, then we'd be talking easier righting
since the farrier f22 is going to use synthetic stays maybe i should look at them and/or swap out the heavy jib tramp wires for synth
edited by: erice, Apr 30, 2010 - 08:46 PM -
- Rank: Master Chief
- Registered: Jun 20, 2006
- Last visit: May 22, 2024
- Posts: 7089
Posted: Apr 30, 2010 - 09:06 AM
you mean the cheese cutter for the 4 way system?
if so i went to vectran, and others i know use dyneema. i went to vectran to reduce creep but i saw that Tornado (from the other forum) leaves a great amount of slack in his to reduce the pull on the tracks (mine are pulling out)
ps my reason for the change was not to save weight but to keep more skin on my legs -
- Rank: Chief
- Registered: Jun 24, 2009
- Last visit: Jun 15, 2023
- Posts: 1555
Posted: Apr 30, 2010 - 10:03 AM
I hear ya, I worked out the weight savings for going from steel to synthetic rigging. It wasn't enough to make it worth it. Carbon boom and mast are probably the simplest changes and provide biggest bang. Still not cheap though. Quite a few 5.5 owners switched to a carbon mast a few years ago, I think they must have done a group purchase to reduce costs, otherwise it would have been astronomically expensive.
I am more wanting a round lower aspect boom to get some extra headspace when tacking and to soften the blow if I get hit with the thing. With me and my crew weighing over 400 lbs, there are definitely cheaper ways to lighten the boat (like tossing the crew overboard at an opportune moment or eating less cheeseburgers).
D.
--
Dave Bonin
1981 Nacra 5.2 "Lucile"
1986 Nacra 5.7 "Belle"
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
-- -
- Rank: Master Chief
- Registered: Jun 20, 2006
- Last visit: May 22, 2024
- Posts: 7089
Posted: Apr 30, 2010 - 10:30 AM
That is ridiculous ... NEVER reduce your cheeseburgers... you never know when you may be stranded (like if the wind stops for 10 minutes) and will need those calories :)
Even with group rates, its still several grand for a carbon mast. my friend works at a spar shop and he has tried to get best possible rates for a bulk purchase and its still 3x the cost of an aluminum one.
-
- Rank: Chief
- Registered: Jun 24, 2009
- Last visit: Jun 15, 2023
- Posts: 1555
Posted: May 10, 2010 - 05:26 PM
Hey check out the new wildcat outhaul!
http://www.thebeachcats.com/index.php?module=pictures&g2_itemId=73363
That is something that I could do on my cat without having to fiddle with internally routing the blocks. Next off to find a piece of thick walled aluminum tubing...
--
Dave Bonin
1981 Nacra 5.2 "Lucile"
1986 Nacra 5.7 "Belle"
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
-- -
- Rank: Master Chief
- Registered: Jun 20, 2006
- Last visit: May 22, 2024
- Posts: 7089
Posted: May 10, 2010 - 05:49 PM
thats really the same thing as i showed above with the viper set up..
me likey.. :) -
- Rank: Chief
- Registered: Jun 24, 2009
- Last visit: Jun 15, 2023
- Posts: 1555
Posted: May 19, 2010 - 12:39 PM
Hey guys, I think I'm going to try and make a round boom with an exteranl outhaul for my 5.2. On Murray's web site you can get aluminum end caps for a 1.5" spin pole that fit a tube with a 3/16" wall thickness (half way between 0.063" and .125). Do you think this will be strong enough for a boom? Anyone have a source for end cap fittings (other than a local machinist)for larger tubes?
D.
--
Dave Bonin
1981 Nacra 5.2 "Lucile"
1986 Nacra 5.7 "Belle"
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
--
