STRUGGLING
at 17knots boatspeed in 8 knots of TWS
Sure, they were dragging compared to JPN, but sh*t.... 17kts in 8? a tough problem to have
Todd Harris:
Hey Ken, Todd here, I'm on assignment covering extreme snake wrangling in Sri Lanka. I'll be there next week. Make sure you cover for me and say completely stupid stuff as we don't know what the hell we are talking about.
Ken Read:
Hey Todd, I got it covered. Pycho-babbling as we speak . . .
Mike
They asked RC to retire. Clearly had a problem when they rounded the mark, but Dip Schit Read missed it.
From America’s Cup Hall of Famer, Mike Drummond – the former Team NZ navigator
What will the defender achieve from racing with the challengers
Fraternizing with the enemy is no longer a sin in the America’s Cup. Controversially including the defender in the challenger fray - for the first time in 166 years - will definitely benefit Oracle.
First and foremost, they will have gleaned plenty of knowledge of the challengers, and learned much about how their own boat races, before they take a vital two weeks off to perfect “17†for the Cup proper.
But they also want the one point that’s up for grabs, which translates into the first win in the America’s Cup match. Should it be a challenger who tops the qualifier series ending on Sunday, they will have to proceed to the Cup match to make the point count.
The next few days are important for Oracle. They will want to deny Team NZ that prized point. “But it’s just as important for them to learn as much as they can, from sailing against strong opposition.â€
Oracle are no mugs – and they have sharp memories of the last Cup where they never stopped developing and improving.
It's hard to disagree with the points he brings up. Added to which, I believe I saw where Oracle was running to different port and starboard daggerboard foils on either side of their boat two days ago presumably to test which ones performed better in the same conditions. Their risk/reward formula is a lot different than the other teams in this round robin series.
I'm still not totally against the defender getting to partake in the round robin but it's hard for me not to have a tinge of bias. Besides my obvious regional bias, this defender has had the vision and insistence to beat back a lot of opposition to the entire idea of multihulls in the America's Cup and has brought us these incredible boats.
Lastly, I suspect that most teams have kept some developmental things out of sight and off the water. This isn't just a day to day race on the water. Also key is the pace to your development because development WILL happen as the race progresses. You need to peak with that development at the right time in order to win the cup. Peak too early, as New Zealand did in the last iteration, and your competition has a chance to discover, develop, and catch you. Peak too late, and well, it's over before it starts. Rest assured, these boats will continue to get faster and faster.
Mike
They asked RC to retire. Clearly had a problem when they rounded the mark, but Dip Schit Read missed it.
As stated in the interview, Sir Ben said they had a systems failure and could not control the daggerboard
Mike
but it's free, so.....
I can't wait to see all the tech that is spawned at the conclusion of the AC cup and the 'secrets' are revealed.
The Phadeo program seems amped up on foils for the most part and they're sending it... Ofshore even...
How is the Phantom F18 foiler doing?
Did I read the next generation G4 cat has some of this hydro adjusting foil tech already?
Did the UFO foiling cat get under production?
And I know Jake's already trying to hack ENTZ database to copy their carbon layup schedule on the foil package.... <img src="<>/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" />
NYYC says they're going to buy drone marks, mostly because they can, I'd imagine.
For a slow race, that GBR/FRA race was a nail-biter! Cammas late to the entry didn't help, but he made a great recovery on the first reach. Ainsle got a better shift/puff on the top half of the last beat, and positioned himself well to take full advantage and win. I'm sure luck was a major factor, though.
Mike

Do you think they would have asked the RC to abandon the race if they were a lap in front? <img src="<>/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused" height="15" width="15" />
IMHO Ben's gybing was the only failure <img src="<>/cool.gif" alt="cool" title="cool" height="15" width="15" />
Was a bit disappointed that the French did win the last race against BAR, they sailed a better race.
Do you think they would have asked the RC to abandon the race if they were a lap in front? <img src="<>/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused" height="15" width="15" />
IMHO Ben's gybing was the only failure <img src="<>/cool.gif" alt="cool" title="cool" height="15" width="15" />
Was a bit disappointed that the French did win the last race against BAR, they sailed a better race.
Agree with your first point, GBR totally blew that first gybe, and in the light air, got themselves way behind. But, Ainsle looked morally defeated as it quickly became obvious that they couldn't get back onto the foils, and I think he gave up on the race at that point.
I too wanted Cammas to win, but he didn't sail a better match race, IMHO (it ain't over till it's over, and you can only get one point or zero). He was late for his port entry, and missed some key shifts and pressure changes late in the race. He then set himself up on port for the final cross at the finish line.
I would agree that he generally appeared to do a better job of sailing the cat in
displacement mode
(apparently, this is the new code for FLOATING on a foiling boat)...
Mike
And I know Jake's already trying to hack ENTZ database to copy their carbon layup schedule on the foil package.... <img src="<>/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" />
Nah. I'm staying out of all this foiling business until things calm the heck down. I don't need that much more frustration in my life and am happy working on the finer details of rigging/sailing at the moment.
Great racing so far, and the trends have really begun to emerge.
Dean Barker is the epitome of grace and sportsmanship. He never whines and he never gloats -- even though he probably has the most right of any skipper here to do both.
Frank Cammas keeps putting on a good face, even though it was obvious from the outset that the Groupama boat simply doesn't foil as well as the others.
Nathan Outteridge must be supremely frustrated. Artemis is sailing much better than the results indicate, but they seem to wind up on the wrong side of most setup choices, close calls, and wind shifts. Other teams are able to capitalize on SWE's mistakes, but SWE can't capitalize on theirs.
Peter Burling is learning to present a modest image and is now coming across very well. Couple that with Emirates' outstanding performance so far and it's difficult to imagine them not coming out on top. Team NZL's boat has consistently been the fastest and their boathandling is unmatched.
Jimmy Spithill is doing a great PR job. He's consistently unassuming, positive, and likeable. On the course, Oracle has made many mistakes but has always stayed in the game. Team USA has been lucky with their comebacks so far though. They aren't as dominant as their score might indicate. I'm sure the team must be very worried about NZL.
Ben Ainslie is looking defeated. His many mistakes and Land Rover BAR's inability to foil in light wind have taken their toll. GBR is not as competitive as they were in the ACWS.
All in all, the racing has been very exciting, and I'm looking forward to seeing more.
I wish I could say the same about the reporting. The America's Cup is the pinnacle of our sport -- it's a shame that we can only get second-rate reporters. TV coverage has been lackluster, focusing on images of teams grinding, people running across the trampoline, and the foil tips. They often fail to show the positions of the boats on the racecourse, and usually miss the reasons for lead changes. Gone are the explanations of the course, the rules, and the tactics that made the last America's Cup understandable to the public.
The post-race interviews, videos, and press releases are amateurish. The only recaps worth reading come from Paul Cayard, and they are dry, dry, dry. The skipper press conference reporters ask fluff questions and never follow up - or are pushing their own agendas. The photos and videos are low in production quality. Yesterday, reporting sank to a new low with allegations of race fixing. One of the reporters had the gall to ask Dean Barker if he intentionally threw the race so that USA could win an AC point. Richard Gladwell (Sail World's AC reporter), who has always been biased for New Zealand, repeated the charge in his article, and went on to say that it looked to him like Softbank JPN intentionally chose the wrong side of the racecourse at Oracles
team order
. Such unfounded accusations of cheating are appallingly unprofessional. Personally, as someone who believes that sportsmanship is a fundamental tenet of sailboat racing, I find it offensive.
I think Sail-World.com is past due for a new reporter.
Sadly,
Eric
what are you sailing these days?
And I know Jake's already trying to hack ENTZ database to copy their carbon layup schedule on the foil package.... <img src="<>/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" />
Nah. I'm staying out of all this foiling business until things calm the heck down. I don't need that much more frustration in my life and am happy working on the finer details of rigging/sailing at the moment.
Eric, I agree. Richard is just trying to sell ad space. It is the new world order of the media, and it nauseates me.
There is some good information buried in the
shock and awe
prose of Gladwell
Oracle closer taking Match point with vital Day 6 win
Sadly, the AC34 scars didn't fair well with NZ. Hindsight being 20/20, it does look that team NZ would be better served with Barker at the helm, he's just that good.
Agree with you also regarding Artemis, Nathan and Iain are really good together, the team is blazing fast and boat handling is right up there with the best teams. . . . They are so close to putting it all together.
Do you think they would have asked the RC to abandon the race if they were a lap in front? <img src="<>/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused" height="15" width="15" />
IMHO Ben's gybing was the only failure <img src="<>/cool.gif" alt="cool" title="cool" height="15" width="15" />
Was a bit disappointed that the French did win the last race against BAR, they sailed a better race.
Ben is frustrated and it shows. Think he might jump off the boat and attack a photographer? I can't get that picture out of my mind.
shock and awe
prose of Gladwell
Oracle closer taking Match point with vital Day 6 win
There is some good information, but Gladwell also needs to check his facts before publishing. For example:
The Kiwis had and average breeze of less than 7kts for their race against Land Rover BAR, and went around the track in 18m 50 secs compared to the 18minutes taken by Oracle Team USA - although both courses were shortened after the start and distances were not the same.
is wrong. The NZL/GBR race was shortened at mark 6, but the USA/JPN race was not. Oracle sailed all 7 legs of the course.
On another note, I was surprised to hear USA hail RC and ask if the race was being shortened -- and even more surprised to hear RC reply. In regular fleet racing, that would constitute outside help and would break rule 41.
Where are the crowds?
I was there in Chicago and the massive and loud crowd was a spectacle in itself and NBC repeatedly panned their cameras across the crowded Navy Pier.
Not so in Bermuda. Has anyone noticed that the grand stands seem to be empty? NBC annoyingly cuts to close ups of a dozen fans waving appropriate flags but rarely (never?) do they show crowds of people on the hard or in the huge grand stand. Sometimes I think those group shots are staged.
Is this like the faked moon landing? AC35...fake news! Is foiling just a trick of CGI?
Eric, I agree with a lot of your points in your longer post. I have some slightly different opinions on some of the skippers, but haven't watched an interview in a few days.
They do have an open channel with the RC. They're fed a lot of data from the RC as well.
One way to solve this problem in
normal
racing is for the RC to make announcements to the fleet (not to answer a specific boat). This takes caution obviously, the RC has to wonder why the question is being asked. If the change is unclear, that's a good reason for a fleet announcement. If you're answering a specific boat who just isn't paying attention, that's probably worthy of radio silence. Either move could cause a redress hearing under the wrong circumstances, but generally speaking, everyone wants more communication from the RC.
Mike
A few days ago, I found Peter Burling to be a bit arrogant, but he's really toned that down in the past couple of briefings. He's adopted a more unassuming attitude that I think goes over much better.
I also thought that Ben Ainslie should have apologized for hitting JPN, or at least shown some concern for the wellbeing of Softbank's crew -- not just his own boat's damage. Karma, however, appears to be catching up with him.
Regards,
Eric
- 57 Forums
- 31.6 K Topics
- 345.9 K Posts
- 1,764 Online
- 31.1 K Members
