Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

N20 shortened side stays?

13 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
5,060 Views
(@evansdb78)
Posts: 74
Member
Topic starter
 
[#28579]

I have heard of guys using shorter side stays on the N20, do most of you guys use the shorter stays or standard length? Right now I have my side stays maxed out at the bottom. No more room to rake.


 
Posted : November 18, 2011 7:53 pm
(@bacho)
Posts: 1502
Master Chief Registered
 

How far back is it at that? Mine fully back using the trap wire and rope from the spin tang lands on the upper gudgeon.I have heard of some people using shorter stays but I feel I may not be able un-rake enough for the really light days if I did that.


 
Posted : November 18, 2011 8:20 pm
(@Anonymous 39709)
Posts: 913
 

I get mine made 1 1/2" shorter than stock. Murray's Marine has a measurement for them and can make the shorter ones.


 
Posted : November 18, 2011 11:35 pm
Todd A. Hart
(@team_cat_fever)
Posts: 3061
Captain Registered
 

I used shorter stays also. The standard measuring method we ( and most N-20 guys) used was trap with a line held to the bridle tangs instead of the spin tangs, marked and then pulled back down the transom. We usually carried the rake around the top of the tang that holds the rudder down, but would vary a hole either way depending on conditions.


 
Posted : November 19, 2011 9:50 am
(@Anonymous 39832)
Posts: 3281
 

I don't know how you guys carry that much rake without the rudders being utterly worthless around the A-mark.

I never liked the feeling of a heavy-raked mast. I know I'm not exactly lighting up the results board but the boat just doesn't *feel* right upwind with that amount of rake on - personally speaking of course.


 
Posted : November 20, 2011 7:07 pm
Todd A. Hart
(@team_cat_fever)
Posts: 3061
Captain Registered
 
Originally Posted by Undecided
I don't know how you guys carry that much rake without the rudders being utterly worthless around the A-mark.

I never liked the feeling of a heavy-raked mast. I know I'm not exactly lighting up the results board but the boat just doesn't *feel* right upwind with that amount of rake on - personally speaking of course.

I bet ya a bottle of rum more rake is faster... Oh yeah, I already did that. By the way, at the rate your paying up, you just as well buy a distillery.


 
Posted : November 20, 2011 8:27 pm
(@Anonymous 39832)
Posts: 3281
 

If I recall correctly, you're under the opinion that maintaining this bottle of rum over my head is a good idea.

I think you get far more enjoyment prodding me about it than you would out of a bottle of rum.


 
Posted : November 21, 2011 8:34 am
(@stank)
Posts: 5061
One Star Admiral Registered
 
Originally Posted by Undecided
I don't know how you guys carry that much rake without the rudders being utterly worthless around the A-mark.

I never liked the feeling of a heavy-raked mast. I know I'm not exactly lighting up the results board but the boat just doesn't *feel* right upwind with that amount of rake on - personally speaking of course.

I had gen 1 rudders, and felt that having rake was a good idea, and had the shorter sidestays which put my setting about the middle of the chainplate. I noticed that having a vertical mast didn't help me point that well (despite my pinching prowess), and sometimes the rudders would stall power-reaching. A little bit of additional rake (from vertical) seemed to settle that down a little bit (along with less daggar and moving back sooner)


 
Posted : November 21, 2011 10:44 am
(@wlrottge)
Posts: 835
Chief Registered
 

I remember measuring the rake on the rudder blade. Up near the head was the upright setting. Out to/past the rudder tip was raked back for a blow. Crazy as that is, the unis are raked even further, but... w/o a jib you have to be.


 
Posted : November 21, 2011 1:03 pm
Todd A. Hart
(@team_cat_fever)
Posts: 3061
Captain Registered
 
Originally Posted by Undecided
If I recall correctly, you're under the opinion that maintaining this bottle of rum over my head is a good idea.

I think you get far more enjoyment prodding me about it than you would out of a bottle of rum.

At this point the interest is at least 2 bottles , so pay up the interest and I'll let you keep paying on the principle. And I think you may be wrong about how much joy I can get out of a bottle of rum.


 
Posted : November 21, 2011 5:14 pm
 Trey
(@NCSUtrey)
Posts: 813
Chief Registered
 

Proper rake for light wind should be at the top of the transom, maybe even an inch forward on the deck or so. For a blow, rake it about halfway down the transom/to the top of the lower gudgeon.


 
Posted : November 21, 2011 6:27 pm
(@bacho)
Posts: 1502
Master Chief Registered
 
Originally Posted by Team_Cat_Fever
I used shorter stays also. The standard measuring method we ( and most N-20 guys) used was trap with a line held to the bridle tangs instead of the spin tangs, marked and then pulled back down the transom. We usually carried the rake around the top of the tang that holds the rudder down, but would vary a hole either way depending on conditions.

Your right, I was measuring from the bridles, not the spin.


 
Posted : November 21, 2011 8:51 pm
(@kbcatman)
Posts: 1444
Master Chief Registered
 
Originally Posted by NCSUtrey
Proper rake for light wind should be at the top of the transom, maybe even an inch forward on the deck or so. For a blow, rake it about halfway down the transom/to the top of the lower gudgeon.

This is the setting I've settled on for the general purpose all-around setting. Really woke the boat up after trying to make more rake work for it. Having the mast raked a bunch only seems to work for us if it's blowing. But then I also use the gen 3 rudders, sail heavy, and bend the spin pole quite a bit to get the right luff tension on the spin.


 
Posted : November 30, 2011 12:12 am
Secret Link