arms race
?
This could be a good thing. If the difference is small enough, it only matters to the best, most competitive sailors. Then they'll run out and buy a new boat and sell their older but still great boat to a less competitive sailor at a discount.
It's the trickle-down theory of class building.
Mike Hill
N20 #1005
Oh yeah! I forget tide and current and since the current can vary all over the course depending on the water depth....

New designs are always faster, it works like this.....
Say you have a three year old
Design X
, you've raced it pretty hard and done well. Then you test sail a brand new
Design Y
and discover it is stiffer, faster and more responsive than your current boat, therefor it must be better so you sell your boat and buy the new one.
The truth is 90% of the 2% difference is that you're comparing 3 year old gear with brand new stuff. Test sail a brand new
Design X
(identical to your current boat) and you'll probably find the same difference.
One thing most F18 sailors will tell you is all the boats (including the older designs) can have their day, More than anything else the new hobie is a marketing and fashion exercise because after 12 years the Tiger is falling out of fashion.
Say you have a three year old
Design X
, you've raced it pretty hard and done well. Then you test sail a brand new
Design Y
and discover it is stiffer, faster and more responsive than your current boat, therefor it must be better so you sell your boat and buy the new one.
The truth is 90% of the 2% difference is that you're comparing 3 year old gear with brand new stuff. Test sail a brand new
Design X
(identical to your current boat) and you'll probably find the same difference.
One thing most F18 sailors will tell you is all the boats (including the older designs) can have their day, More than anything else the new hobie is a marketing and fashion exercise because after 12 years the Tiger is falling out of fashion.
Well said!


Yeah, i was thinking the same thing too b/c a step would be 90 degrees to what it is on this hull... but got to thinking a/b the way water flows over these hulls. It's not just a fore/aft flow but there is a lot of flow vertically in that area of the hull. Unless Hobie tells us, this is all guess work anyway.

Cheshirecatman
OK, I can see that. I can really feel that water washing over the deck and hitting the front beam on the I20 and it drives me nuts. Nacra solved that on the Infusion by making the top forward deck relatively flush with the main beam. They wouldn't stop a pitchpole but maybe you can get a little lift out of it with those chines (or whatever you would call them).
Cheshirecatman
OK, I can see that. I can really feel that water washing over the deck and hitting the front beam on the I20 and it drives me nuts. Nacra solved that on the Infusion by making the top forward deck relatively flush with the main beam. They wouldn't stop a pitchpole but maybe you can get a little lift out of it with those chines (or whatever you would call them).
I can't see the angle or additional buoyancy of the rails doing anything for pitchpole resistance, even in a modest bow down attitude. However, look at the low down hull buoyancy.
Cheshirecatman

Shark Catamaran (check out the spray deflector on the bow):
If you look closely at these Cougar catamarans, you can see the same spray deflector (this is from 1965):
You can add:
Hellcat and other early c-class
Manta
Thai
Shearwater
Dolphin
Yachting World Cat
and I am sure many others. All 40+ years old.
Cheshirecatman


ahh... consider it character building to forgo the pretty pretty and just try to win with the basics!
But... if the contest is limited just to the bar after the race... Pretty Pretty has enormous rhetorical value and you should absolutely go for it.
Now curved banana boards in the A class that is a story yet to be told... so it could be worse!
- 57 Forums
- 31.6 K Topics
- 345.9 K Posts
- 1,420 Online
- 31.1 K Members
