Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

New UK designed and built foiling catamaran

91 Posts
24 Users
0 Reactions
92.9 K Views
(@nacramanuk)
Posts: 97
Member
Topic starter
 
Originally Posted by Tony_F18
Ah,that makes sense. Missed the part about it weighing 75kg.
Hope you bring it to Texel next year.

It will be there....


 
Posted : July 31, 2014 2:23 pm
 Karl
(@sogncab)
Posts: 3551
Member
 
Originally Posted by tback
Well Karl, that eliminates sailing UNI.

I'm thinking stick em in before it even comes off the trailer. And certainly before you rig it. Boards would probably be the first thing to go in.


 
Posted : July 31, 2014 2:38 pm
(@bille)
Posts: 188
Mate Registered
 

VERY COOL Design !!

Bille


 
Posted : August 1, 2014 1:25 pm
(@brucat)
Posts: 3939
Member
 

That thing is exactly what we need.

It's already in your color, Karl. Brilliant choice, if that doesn't attract attention, nothing will...

Mike


 
Posted : August 2, 2014 8:33 am
(@Anonymous 39832)
Posts: 3281
 
Originally Posted by NacramanUK
Originally Posted by Tony_F18
Originally Posted by NacramanUK
Originally Posted by Tony_F18
It does look more difficult to launch from the beach compared to the 'L' foils.

The foils fully retract to the hull surface for launching and landing....

How do you insert the boards when you are on the beach?
Won't the T foil break when you pull the boat on its side (assuming they enter from the bottom).

It weighs 75kgs.......you get someone to lift the bows or stern on the beach and insert from below.......designer is going to do a video this weekend of the whole process.....

Make sure the rigging at the top of the stick is squared away before you put the boards in. No flipping that bitch over on her side on the beach.


 
Posted : August 2, 2014 10:20 am
(@bacho)
Posts: 1502
Master Chief Registered
 

A set of chocks designed for the boat could solve that problem.


 
Posted : August 2, 2014 2:18 pm
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

With the light weight, it's probably possible to tip it over on the bows.


 
Posted : August 3, 2014 8:38 am
(@rehmbo)
Posts: 541
Chief Registered
 

Land based pitch-pole. I like it!


 
Posted : August 3, 2014 8:28 pm
(@todd_sails)
Posts: 1149
Member
 

This is so excellent.
I'm predicting that many boats will be made and sailed with foiling design in the next few years.
Sorry Nacra- but your half so designs so far don't touch this- yet. Nacra?
Still not predicting earthquakes, or anything about the temperature though.


 
Posted : August 14, 2014 6:54 am
(@nacramanuk)
Posts: 97
Member
Topic starter
 

Launching......

Launching


 
Posted : August 16, 2014 6:59 pm
 Karl
(@sogncab)
Posts: 3551
Member
 

Jesus. Finally something else about this boat. Edge of my seat here.


 
Posted : August 16, 2014 7:03 pm
Luiz
 Luiz
(@luiz)
Posts: 1238
Member
 

Nice boat!

Originally Posted by Jake
With the light weight, it's probably possible to tip it over on the bows.

Doable, provided the spinnaker pole is easy to swing out of the way.

The use of Moth like (or equal) foil technology is a natural -and smart- move. It saves R&D time and money, plus the parts are readily available (or easy to scale up).

Still, J foils are probably less draggy, besides the practical advantages already mentioned in this thread.

No spi for me, please, just an upwind headsail for light conditions.


 
Posted : August 17, 2014 11:59 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

a couple of little things.

1. Moth style foils were tried on C-cats and proved slow. L/J/Z/C foils have proven fast. Obviously there are a lot of things that effect the cross over on where different systems are beneficial but right now the evidence points towards the non-wand systems being faster.

2.

52 MANUAL POWER
A boat’s standing rigging, running rigging, spars and movable hull
appendages shall be adjusted and operated only by the power
provided by the crew.

<-- Moths modify this rule in their sailing instructions/class rules. As such sailing a boat like this in an event that doesn't change this rule would be impossible. It has taken how many years for cats to become

acceptable

, how long will it take to get this rule dropped?


 
Posted : August 17, 2014 6:14 pm
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Originally Posted by Scarecrow
a couple of little things.

1. Moth style foils were tried on C-cats and proved slow. L/J/Z/C foils have proven fast. Obviously there are a lot of things that effect the cross over on where different systems are beneficial but right now the evidence points towards the non-wand systems being faster.

2.

52 MANUAL POWER
A boat’s standing rigging, running rigging, spars and movable hull
appendages shall be adjusted and operated only by the power
provided by the crew.

<-- Moths modify this rule in their sailing instructions/class rules. As such sailing a boat like this in an event that doesn't change this rule would be impossible. It has taken how many years for cats to become

acceptable

, how long will it take to get this rule dropped?

One could argue that the crew adjust the sails, sails capture wind propelling the boat forward, and the wands use the forward motion that resulted from the sailor's

power

.

The intent of that rule was to disallow motorized, hydraulics, and/or other types of stored energy systems. I don't think there should be an issue with a wand tapping the surface of the water and adjusting a foil.


 
Posted : August 17, 2014 7:30 pm
(@bille)
Posts: 188
Mate Registered
 
Originally Posted by Scarecrow
a couple of little things.

...

I agree with what you say, but as a sailplane pilot and avid
HG pilot ; i really wouldn't mind having control over
the height above the water, on a machine like a foiling Catamaran.
IF
the controls were made Simple !!

Had this same discussion with a world class Rigid wing pilot
who also happens to be an airline captain, and avid sailor .
He's the one who convinced me of such .
Only the
inept arm-chair sailors
Need a devise that does this automatically.

Think about it : Your on a broad-reach, in 3-ft chop; you
really want some mechanical devise telling Ya how High you should be above the water ?

Bille


 
Posted : August 17, 2014 7:41 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 
Originally Posted by Jake
One could argue that the crew adjust the sails, sails capture wind propelling the boat forward, and the wands use the forward motion that resulted from the sailor's

power

.

The intent of that rule was to disallow motorized, hydraulics, and/or other types of stored energy systems. I don't think there should be an issue with a wand tapping the surface of the water and adjusting a foil.

I 100% agree and the issue expressed isn't mine but the accepted interpretation by the one class that has made foiling a true success and the reason they write the change of ISAF rules into their rules. Which is my point about the need for a rule change or an official interpretation. If I was one of the people behind this project I'd be contacting the ISAF and getting an official interpretation before investing production and marketing funds. This won't be a cheap boat and if is to be a success it will be racing sailors buying it and they wont buy it if they're worried about being protested out of big events.


 
Posted : August 17, 2014 8:37 pm
(@Anonymous 13024)
Posts: 4319
 

What is the point of this boat?

1: To be faster than archimedan beachcats

2: To be a foiling beachcat

3: To be a line-honors beachcat

4: Have fun

When comparing the technology in this boat with

Off Yer Rocker

, why is this boat a possible success compared to the first foiling C-class? Is the wand control system a

faster

solution compared to non-adjusting foils?

Do get meg right. I really like this boat and effort! Would definately like to have one myself <img src="<>/smile.gif" alt="smile" title="smile" height="15" width="15" />


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 2:57 am
(@bacho)
Posts: 1502
Master Chief Registered
 

I feel that without details and numbers from the foils, we can't really say that this boat has foils just like those C foils. I'm not sure that we are comparing apples to apples.

I think it's rather exciting, a 75kg double handed sounds nice! I am prepared to be let down on the price though.


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 6:12 am
(@nacramanuk)
Posts: 97
Member
Topic starter
 

Foil testing......

Foil testing


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 7:05 am
Rob Vaden
(@redtwin)
Posts: 510
Chief Registered
 
Originally Posted by Rolf_Nilsen
What is the point of this boat?

1: To be faster than archimedan beachcats

2: To be a foiling beachcat

3: To be a line-honors beachcat

4: Have fun

When comparing the technology in this boat with

Off Yer Rocker

, why is this boat a possible success compared to the first foiling C-class? Is the wand control system a

faster

solution compared to non-adjusting foils?

Rolf,
That's exactly what I was thinking. What speed is the boat traveling in the vortex test video? I would be curious to compare numbers with non-foiling (F-18?) and other foiling boats in the same conditions. The Whisper does seem to get up on foils pretty early but that doesn't surprise me comparing the lifting surface area. I bet it has an advantage in low wind but would get mowed down by a c-foiling boat once the wind picked up. I'm not an engineer or a scientist so this is all layman speculation.

I think the Whisper would be a hoot to use in a light/moderate wind Round the Island. At least until you get to the

narrows

.

Regardless of the price it will be out of my budget, but I would be surprised if it comes out any lower than 30K. I would think a great price would be in the low to mid 20s. Heck, at that price I may own a used one in a decade or two.


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 7:59 am
 Karl
(@sogncab)
Posts: 3551
Member
 

I think just about everything will get taken out by a modern C -Cat wouldn't it? But, hardly anyone can afford one, very few sail them, even less build them.

I just want to know how this, or any of the other readily available foiling boats, do around the cans. Does this, the Phantom, or the Nacra 20 foil going upwind? Do they go upwind well? How ugly are the tacks and gybes?

This thing looks, really cool and right up my alley. But if it can't go to weather for crap, there's no point for me. That's the downside of any of these videos. You can't really tell how they would do against another design. Line it up against a A-Cat, an F16, and an F18 on a windward leeward and see how they stack up.

It sure looks stable!

I'd bet by the time you get one shipped to the US, it'd be pushing close to $40k.


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 8:48 am
(@david.ingram)
Posts: 3879
Captain Registered
 

Why would this foiler be more successful than this one:

http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=7984


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 9:12 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Originally Posted by Karl_Brogger
I think just about everything will get taken out by a modern C -Cat wouldn't it? But, hardly anyone can afford one, very few sail them, even less build them.

I just want to know how this, or any of the other readily available foiling boats, do around the cans. Does this, the Phantom, or the Nacra 20 foil going upwind? Do they go upwind well? How ugly are the tacks and gybes?

This thing looks, really cool and right up my alley. But if it can't go to weather for crap, there's no point for me. That's the downside of any of these videos. You can't really tell how they would do against another design. Line it up against a A-Cat, an F16, and an F18 on a windward leeward and see how they stack up.

It sure looks stable!

I'd bet by the time you get one shipped to the US, it'd be pushing close to $40k.

I think there's some confusion on the terminology - I think somebody started talking about

c shaped foils

(which are old tech...I think they mean

J

boards like the America's Cup and C-cats used). Somebody mentioned C-cats and made it all confusing.


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 9:23 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Originally Posted by David Ingram
Why would this foiler be more successful than this one:

http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=7984

GREAT Point! that boat has all but been forgotten! But, to address your question, the Windrider Rave weighed in around 400lbs and setup time was measured in fractions of a day.

We should also ask the same question about this one that predates the Rave. The trifoiler came around in the early 90's (I think).
Hobie Trifoiler


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 9:28 am
Philip
(@pm)
Posts: 3376
Captain Registered
 

Because the trifoiler, although fun, sucks in anything but the ideal conditions and point of sail.


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 9:35 am
Rob Vaden
(@redtwin)
Posts: 510
Chief Registered
 

Yeah, I was talking about C-shaped foils, not the C-cats.


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 11:19 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

The reason C-cats were brought up (by me) was because the Canadians went down the same design path as the

whisper

7 years ago when they spent hundreds of thousands of dollars building

Off Yer Rocker

[Linked Image]

And of course half way through the event, because it was slow, they did this:

[Linked Image]


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 6:27 pm
(@todd_sails)
Posts: 1149
Member
 

Ah yes, the Ketterman tri foiler. I think he sold to Hobie?
My old boat, the 'Millenium Falcon' sailed right by once one day when someone brought one to the TX City Dike.
That boat that's in my Avatar
It was on it's foils, I was on a close reach, not going to weather, and not quite beam.


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 10:39 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

or there is this (a bit smaller):

[Linked Image]

http://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/balnarring/sail-boats/catamaran-stealth-for-sale/1053315860


 
Posted : August 18, 2014 10:57 pm
(@bille)
Posts: 188
Mate Registered
 
Originally Posted by Scarecrow
a couple of little things.

1. Moth style foils were tried on C-cats and proved slow. L/J/Z/C foils have proven fast. Obviously there are a lot of things that effect the cross over on where different systems are beneficial but right now the evidence points towards the non-wand systems being faster.

...

Moth style foils are called T-foils.
T-foils are slower than J-foils.
BUT
We use T-foils with our kite boards ; and they have
gone over 40kts with them. That's NOT too Bad ?

Seriously -- if i were to build a catamaran for the purpose
of selling it ; i wouldn't Want it to go much faster than
35-kts, because of liability issues !! ?
I WOULD want it to be Very stable, and easy to sail.

Up-wind on a T-foil with a kite board ; they will Blow-by
any conventional devise currently available ; and do it
in Less wind. SO a decently designed T-foil should do
quite well on a catamaran.

Wing loading on the hydrofoil, has proven to be a BIG
thing with our kite boards ; wonder if it affects a heavier
catamaran as well ?

Bille


 
Posted : August 19, 2014 4:41 pm
Page 2 / 4
Secret Link