Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

Taipan cost?

49 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
21.6 K Views
(@jalani)
Posts: 1370
Member
 

With respect Rick, that user clearly doesn't want to be identified as a quick check of the User List will verify. No information at all - not even a location.

In addition his/her? choice of name is clearly provocative as is the signature. I would surmise that this all indicates his/her true intentions. (none of them positive)


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 8:42 am
BobG
 BobG
(@drayfisher)
Posts: 570
Member
Topic starter
 

Hey Rick, maybe you can answer the question. I did'nt realize that the cost of the two Taipans was so involved.No wonder it takes years to develop a class these days! Thanks for the try Robi.. thanks Bob G.


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 8:49 am
scooby_simon
(@simonJlongstaff)
Posts: 3496
Captain Registered
 

John,

I help to look after another website Forum that uses the same software as this one does, Rick will know this person's IP address and will also know a few details of the "person" including an e-mail address; I know it is not much; but this person can be traced.


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 9:57 am
(@wouter)
Posts: 9363
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

An e-mail adress can be had for free an totally anonymous at various hostings. Hell, you could just log into Hotmail and create an account under a weird name within 2 minutes. Try and trace that !

Than if one is careful enough to use a provider with DHCP IP adress assigning then not even that can be used to pinpoint a given user. Only his broad location. Sort of like the user is somebody in North Carolina. Not sufficient to stand up in court, I say.

One can just as well map lunar brightness to geographical location and get the same broad result. HOWWWWLLLLL !!! (F16 insider joke)

Wouter


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 10:34 am
 robi
(@robi)
Posts: 2686
Captain Registered
 

NM


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 12:30 pm
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

It felt like I was in the old forum there for a second!


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 2:26 pm
(@edgarapoe)
Posts: 3222
Member
 

Don't worry, we're safe!


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 3:11 pm
bvining
(@bvining)
Posts: 1208
Member
 

Robi,
Those look like Flyer rudder head on your boat. Are they?

Did the Proctor spreaders come standard?

Looks nice, I like it.
Bill


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 4:15 pm
(@Anonymous 14944)
Posts: 989
 

I just hope it isn't SAM logged in with a different email address and name? I for one couldn't handle him as a "co joined" clone.


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 8:28 pm
(@catman)
Posts: 1600
Master Chief Registered
 

BLAH,BLAH,BLAH,BLAH,

I got to tell some of you to take your negative attitudes and shove' em were the sun don't shine. Some of you are so DAMM petty. This place is starting to sound like a friking soap. Your a bunch of girls. Take some Motrin. Get a life!

Why don't you go sailing and try and have some fun.

Here's an idea,PM each other so you don't make us all look like morons.

I don't care how many F16's there are in the world just as long as those people are happy and sailing.

This site is here to promote a fine sport and recreation.


 
Posted : July 21, 2005 10:24 pm
 robi
(@robi)
Posts: 2686
Captain Registered
 
Quote
Robi,
Those look like Flyer rudder head on your boat. Are they?

I have NO idea

Quote
I don't care how many F16's there are in the world just as long as those people are happy and sailing.

Thank you very much. Well said Mike![Linked Image]


 
Posted : July 22, 2005 5:48 am
(@Anonymous 692)
Posts: 263
 

So, after an incredible amount of B.S., what's the cost of a Taipan?


 
Posted : July 22, 2005 7:53 am
bullswan
(@bullswan)
Posts: 435
Chief Registered
 

I'd like to know the cost as well.............
But can someone give it some context and rank the prices of comparable boats that have been mentioned in this thread so that it really means something?

Thanks,
Greg


 
Posted : July 22, 2005 8:14 am
BobG
 BobG
(@drayfisher)
Posts: 570
Member
Topic starter
 

Yeh I wanna know to because when I get one I'm trying to figure where my out riggers are gonna go? Are Taipans easy to milk?


 
Posted : July 22, 2005 9:12 am
(@wouter)
Posts: 9363
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

Why don't you go the classified section and see what Rick wants for it yourself ?

The info you seek is right there.

Comparisons. Rick sold his T5.7 earlier this year I believe (or late 2004) for less. That is what the discussion is all about

Wouter


 
Posted : July 22, 2005 9:43 am
BobG
 BobG
(@drayfisher)
Posts: 570
Member
Topic starter
 

I know what the damn thing cost I have seen both of the boats. How much does your Typhoon cost to make or is there a factory for that, do we have Typhoons in America ? How fast is it compared to a Mystere Twister the boat they copied the H tigerrrr from!" Bartender , bartender ".


 
Posted : July 22, 2005 8:37 pm
(@Anonymous 27)
Posts: 213
 

For new boats here is the AHPC website:
http://www.ahpc.com.au
They do not make the Taipan 5.7 as of 2004.
They do make the 4.9, A-Cat, and the Capricorn F18.
Speaking of the Capricorn does anyone know if there are any in the US yet?

I am the one who bought Ricks 5.7. For me the boat fits perfectly for what I want to do. I want to race to have fun and I want a boat that hauls a$$ in 8 knots of wind and won't kill me when I have to drag it across the beach during low tide to the trailer. For what I want the cost was well justified. I think I got an awesome boat at a great deal. If I was a competative racer I am sure I would have bought an F18 due to my current "sumo-sailor" status If I was more sveldt I would have probably went with an F16 due to it's versality of solo or two up sailing.


 
Posted : July 23, 2005 1:20 am
(@samevans)
Posts: 389
Member
 

KW,
The fact that a boat with a higher(slower) rating occasionally wins is irrelevant.
Luck and crew experience can make up the difference in ratings, OCCASIONALLY.
The two Isotopes each won a race against the much faster Taipans.
That is not "Fair Racing", that is throwing dice.

The Isotopes had a choice of a small, varied Open Class or to "pretend" to be an f16.
You had previously drafted the Isotope into your first f16 efforts, but have removed them from your grandfather list.

No one has ignored the Taipans, on the contrary, I pointed them out, you didn't.
I "selected" the parts that you intentionally left out.
But you did show up with an over Class sized spinnaker off of your old Prindle and raced agaist the Class legal boats didn't you?
That shows a lot of "character".

Let's see, you claimed to be working on your boat on 10/05/01, you installed the last parts on 7/24/04, and you finally sailed on 7/25/04.
You claimed to have been "working" on that boat for THIRTY-THREE (33) MONTHS!!!.
Strangely, you never posted a single picture of the boat during construction, no matter how many of your class members asked.
Tell who actually built the hulls and platform.
You lied to everyone about when you started, how much,if any, progress was being made and when you were going to finish.
There was plenty of "smoke and mirrors".

You chickened out of the Round Texel (AGAIN) this year, with another B.S. excuse.
What is your definition of "regularly" and "alot higher"?
How many races have you won and how many regattas have you won?
Give us links to yours and my race results and remember that club races don't count.

Quote
Actually that is the way a Formula setup works. It limits a boats maximum performance by ruling on certain features. It does not force a minimum performance upon boats.

You can bring an underpowered, non-spinnaker and overweight boat to the F18 championships and race it first in wins (e.q. as an F18) with other F18's !

It all comes down whether, as the owner of such a boat, you would want to do such a thing. Apparently the Isotope sailors did just want such a thing at springfever 2002.

THAT is the way a formula class works. Nothing misleading about that

Well congratulations, you just beat Darryl for the most ridiculous statement contest.
What class forces "a minimum performance upon boats"?
Who in their right mind would buy a totally non-competitive boat and join a formula class where they have no chance of winning?
TOTAL B.S.

catman,
The purpose of an open forum is to allow everyone to voice their own, personal opinion.
It allows both sides of a disagreement to be voiced.
If false or misleading statements are used by either side, it affords an opportunity for the truth, the whole truth to come out.
How would you like it if you came here for the first time to ask about which boat to buy and one group of people lied about their boats?
They understated the cost, overstated the performance, and exagerated the numbers of their boats actively class racing.
Would you want everyone to ignore this and allow you to buy one of these boats without ever speaking up?
Or would you want a simple list of the non-participation by a class so you can make your own decision?

Darryl,
Again you flatter yourself.
I have never had a need to hide my identity.
I have always expressed my opinions openly without ulterior motives, unlike you.

Robi,
WHAT IS YOUR RANK AND DUTY ASSIGNMENT?
Are you ashamed?


 
Posted : July 23, 2005 11:38 am
 robi
(@robi)
Posts: 2686
Captain Registered
 
Quote
Robi,
WHAT IS YOUR RANK AND DUTY ASSIGNMENT?
Are you ashamed?

No not at all. But I answer what I feal like answering. At this moment, I dont feal like answering you. If anyone else is interested, I will answer without any issues via PM. My rank, title or rate is seriously NONE of your business.


 
Posted : July 23, 2005 11:57 am
Page 2 / 2
Secret Link