Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

What do you tow with

361 Posts
59 Users
0 Reactions
277.6 K Views
Mark P
(@markpressdee)
Posts: 948
Member
 

Here's my trusty 12yr old Toyota Hiace. The Cats behind are worth thousands more. The A on top of the F16 belongs to my friend who is in the picture below (left unfortunately) but I thought you might like the link between the photo's.


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 12:56 pm
(@Anonymous 2286)
Posts: 268
 
Quote
Anybody tow with a sports car?
Any 2 seater/ragtops?

What about a Miata? <img src=

alt=

/>

Just for the information of those who are comparing, American Gallons are smaller than Imperial (British/Canadian). Here is the conversion.
1 imperial gal = 1.2009 U S gals = 4.5446 Litres
1 USG = .8327 Imp. Gal = 3.7843 L.
10 Litres = 2.6425 USG = 2.2004 Imp. Gal.

From http://www.roadogz.com/productionoffice/calculate.htm


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 12:56 pm
hobie1616
(@hobie1616)
Posts: 2117
Captain Registered
 
Quote
SO, my questions are:
(1) When towing, is it easier on your vehicle if you have manual transmission or automatic?

Auto trannys have become a very good at power transfer so there is very little difference. I still prefer a manual as I’m an old guy who learned with one.

Quote
(2) What causes the decrease in mpg when you are towing? Is it the actual amount of weight on the trailer? I would think that once inertia kicks in at steady highway speeds on flat roads, the trailer would be irrelevant (but apparently NOT).

(3) Or is it the windage (drag) of the trailer and boats that brings down the mpg?

It’s a combination of the two. Inertia will be overcome by drag and wheel friction.

Quote
(4) Or does it have something to do with the size of the trailer wheels vis-a-vis the size of the vehicle wheels?

There’s a number of things to consider when looking at wheels. The larger the wheel diameter, the more energy to get it spinning. There’s also bearing and road friction. One thing that would reduce drag would be to make the tire and rim narrower but the trade off would be weight capacity.


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 1:13 pm
Mark P
(@markpressdee)
Posts: 948
Member
 

I'll try again. It helps if you attach the right file!!


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 1:13 pm
hobie1616
(@hobie1616)
Posts: 2117
Captain Registered
 

The vehicle in the bottom left picture is missing its backup lights.


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 1:43 pm
MaryAWells
(@maryawells)
Posts: 5485
Member
 
Quote
There’s a number of things to consider when looking at wheels. The larger the wheel diameter, the more energy to get it spinning. There’s also bearing and road friction. One thing that would reduce drag would be to make the tire and rim narrower but the trade off would be weight capacity.

Wow, I never thought about that before, but I guess that's why the tires on horse-racing sulkies are very skinny -- and on racing bicycles.
* * * * *
As far as wind drag, has anybody ever come up with a way to make the rig more aerodynamic for trailering?


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 1:52 pm
hobie1616
(@hobie1616)
Posts: 2117
Captain Registered
 
Quote
Wow, I never thought about that before, but I guess that's why the tires on horse-racing sulkies are very skinny -- and on racing bicycles.
* * * * *
As far as wind drag, has anybody ever come up with a way to make the rig more aerodynamic for trailering?

Some road bikes use tires that are only 18 cm across. Really skinny but they still have to carry the same weight of the rider and bike so they may bulge out more where the tire contacts the road.

Removing the tramp might reduce drag.


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 2:23 pm
(@Anonymous 76)
Posts: 359
 
Quote
1998 Dodge Ram 1500, 5.2 V8, 5 spd manual, K&N filter w/ cat back exhaust. The things got 210,000 miles on and gets 16-17 mpg whether its pulling a cat or not.

Same, but 4x4, only 132,000 mi and no kids. Also, AirRaid instead of K&N.


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 4:04 pm
(@Anonymous 76)
Posts: 359
 
Quote
And for when you arrive and don't want to use a 27' RV as a run about:

[Linked Image]

Hey, Chris, that sure is a sharp-looking runabout! Oh, and the scooter is cute too.


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 4:09 pm
(@Anonymous 39155)
Posts: 3112
 
Quote
Quote
And for when you arrive and don't want to use a 27' RV as a run about:

[Linked Image]

Hey, Chris, that sure is a sharp-looking runabout! Oh, and the scooter is cute too.

What scooter?


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 5:12 pm
(@JLienti)
Posts: 388
Mate Registered
 

My skipper should win for worst MPG's. He tows with a GMC motor home. It gets about 7MPG but sure makes the

camping

better. <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 6:34 pm
JoeLeonard
(@fjleonard)
Posts: 118
Member
 

Ok...after towing double stacked N20's today for the first time, I'll chime in...because I think I should get a couple of awards....
I drive a Black 2003 GMC Sierra Denali with a 6.0 litre V8, AWD, and Quadrasteer (yes all four wheels turn). I love my truck for a lot of reasons...it just

goes

anywhere I want in any conditions, and does so with comfort and class....only one (major) flaw....you'll read in a moment. Sooo....IMHO...we're WAY up there on the

Cool

factor!! Picture (sorry I don't have one to share at the moment!) 2 gorgeous Nacra 20's stacked and flyin' down the hiway behind a beautiful shiny black truck that stands out against most other trucks all on it's own to begin with!!!

Now...for the bad part.....and all my Euro friends can get their rocks ready to throw!!! I definitely get the gas guzzler award. Normal (non-towing) MPG is 12.7 city/hiway combined 50/50, doing 85 on the hiway. Towing a single boat at 75 on the hiway...11.7. Now for the really bad news.....(Do the Euro's and Aussies have rocks ready with arms ****??)...Double stacked and only 65MPH down the hiway....a whopping 9.3MPG!!! And I'm starting a 1000 mile trip to Florida Monday!

I think I either need to buy an oil well...or start looking for a

less cool

tow vehicle!!

JL
(dodging the stones from across the pond!!)


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 7:08 pm
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
 

Yeah double stacked 20's is rough. We got 7mpg or thereabouts with Trey's truck with double stacked 20's on the way to tradewinds.


 
Posted : November 11, 2006 9:47 pm
(@Anonymous 335)
Posts: 566
 

Joe,
I even get better than that with a 35' RV weighing 19,500 lbs and pulling a double stack. I got around 9.5 mph on the trip up to the F18 Na's driving around 70mph. On the flat lands I can get 10 to 12 mph and better if going slower. My F250 gets around 15 to 17 towing at 70 mph.


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 12:07 am
C2 Mike
(@TigerMike)
Posts: 329
Mate Registered
 
Quote
I have a Honda Odyssey (minivan, with automatic transmission). It gets 29-30 mpg on the highway with no trailer.

Every year I end up pulling a trailer loaded with boats from Key Largo to Ohio, over the mountains. With two Hobie Waves double-stacked (and a couple sets of beach wheels) the mileage goes down to about 23 mpg.

SO, my questions are:
(1) When towing, is it easier on your vehicle if you have manual transmission or automatic?

Depends on the car. If it is underpowered for the load and constantly changing between the top two gears, a manual in 2nd top gear is probably the go. Holding an auto in 2nd top and making sure it has a cooler attached should be fine but don't run it at top speed for hours on end.

Quote
(2) What causes the decrease in mpg when you are towing? Is it the actual amount of weight on the trailer? I would think that once inertia kicks in at steady highway speeds on flat roads, the trailer would be irrelevant (but apparently NOT).

(3) Or is it the windage (drag) of the trailer and boats that brings down the mpg?

Whilst you are accelerating most you are fighting the weight at lower speeds and a combination as it increases. When you are cruising, it's mostly windage that is the problem. You are in effect driving with a big parachute out the back of your car.

Quote
(4) Or does it have something to do with the size of the trailer wheels vis-a-vis the size of the vehicle wheels?

Not with regard to MPG. I do like the idea of larger trailer wheels though. A 15

wheel will do far less RPM than a 11

wheel and thus your wheel bearings and tyres etc etc will give far less trouble.

Tiger Mike


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 2:58 am
C2 Mike
(@TigerMike)
Posts: 329
Mate Registered
 
Quote
(4) Or does it have something to do with the size of the trailer wheels vis-a-vis the size of the vehicle wheels?

There’s a number of things to consider when looking at wheels. The larger the wheel diameter, the more energy to get it spinning. There’s also bearing and road friction. One thing that would reduce drag would be to make the tire and rim narrower but the trade off would be weight capacity.

IMHO the friction from larger dia wheel/tyre combo on a boat trailer would be virtually nil compared to that of overall wind-drag at 40+ mph. I think it would be a no-brainer in most cases.

Tiger Mike


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 3:06 am
MaryAWells
(@maryawells)
Posts: 5485
Member
 

Has anybody heard of, or tried, air tabs? www.airtab.com


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 3:55 am
(@Anonymous 6548)
Posts: 1652
 

My old tow vehicle..... Vintage Sports Car I guess

1977 Ford XC Fairmont GXL Coupe

Engine
351 ci Cleveland
2V Close chamber heads
4V Exhaust Valves
2V inlet Valves

Fuel
Methanol
Custom Nitro Methane Injection

Drive Line
Gear Box - Top Loader
Diff - 9 inch with 3.5 gears
4 wheel disc breaks
13 inch x 15 inch rear wheels (12 slot rims)
11 inch x 14 inch Front wheels (12 slot rims not pictured here)

Factory wind back sun roof.

[Linked Image]


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 4:06 am
(@flatlander)
Posts: 1108
Master Chief Registered
 
Quote
When towing, is it easier on your vehicle if you have manual transmission or automatic?

Towing is easier on a manual tansmission. Most or some (well especially older vehicles) automatics will have a tendancy to shift in and out of overdrive more often than normal during towing, due to the additional drag and weight of the boat and trailer. Except in the case of larger vehicles with huge towing capacities, this heats up the transmission fluid more than normal operation. Check your owners manual for recommended towing practices. Some will suggest turning the overdride off (if function is available) or keeping the transmission selector in the next to highest gear (3 or 4). In either case this is preventing the transmission from making more frequent shifts.

A transmission cooler may be added by any competent mechanic and are available at all chain auto parts stores. The transmission fluid lines are routed to the front of the vehicle for cooling anyway making it a fairly easy modification that should cost less than $200. If you feel your vehicled is overworked, it's a fairly inexpensive insurance policy to have. Or, have your transmission serviced at the

Heavy use

interavals. Personaly we change the fluid more often.

Since the old days and

sport

vehivles were brought up...

Had great fun towing the spanking new '81 H16 with our '67 Camaro, 327ci/275hp. Wish we still had that little rascal. <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 11:08 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

1991 Shasta (McNasty)

[Linked Image]

Also use a scooter for local transport - '85 Honda 150 Elite - gets 72mpg and can sustain 60mph.

[Linked Image]

For local stuff where I've got somewhere to put my head...a 2000 Nissan 4WD crew cab Frontier that's gets a dismal 16mpg towing on the highway.

[Linked Image]


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 1:33 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
Quote
[Linked Image]

Happily tows the F18 on a trailer at highway speeds.

and gets 38mpg around town.

Scarecrow, what kind of car is that?

Mary is a Peuguet 206 (already mentioned elsewhere.

With regards to the sports car question. I used to tow my A Cat with a Nissan NX (Targa top). People, your boats weight less than 3 adult passengers sitting in the back sit would. You don't need a big car to pull a beach cat.


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 1:43 pm
(@Anonymous 17342)
Posts: 885
Topic starter
 

Yeah, we don't need huge cars to pull our boats but....what about all the gear and stuff, plus gas is replaceable, right??
I am pretty happy with what I tow with, I can manage over 20mpg while still having an SUV with a V-8. I think I have the best of both worlds with my ford explorer.


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 1:56 pm
(@stitus)
Posts: 248
Mate Registered
 

I have a Ford F250 with the 6.0 liter diesel. I get about 15 m.p.g. on the highway with just the boat if I keep the speed at or below 75. I usually tow a 27-foot 5th wheel (maybe 8,000 pounds) with the boat behind that. It's reasonably comfortable and is a four-door so I can carry the family or crew and still have lots of room for gear. I drove it to Texoma and got 9.5 to 12.5 m.p.g. at 70 m.p.h. It has trailer brakes so control is really good, even with the train, and power is never an issue. I can go way faster than I'd ever want to with all that stuff hanging off the back and I can still pass pretty easily. Without anything on it, I get 21+ on the highway and 16 around town.


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 3:25 pm
(@Anonymous 13024)
Posts: 4319
 

I must agree with Scarecrow. You dont need a V-8 or even a V-6 to pull a beachcat. Not even over mountains.. My Ford Focus 1.6liters is sufficient even with a Tornado+tools/spares on the trailer and camping gear in the back. Milage is good even then. But I would not choose a french car for it, Scarecrow <img src=

alt=

/>

Mary: Check http://www.peugeot.com/en/default.htm for more Peugeots.


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 3:55 pm
(@Anonymous 2286)
Posts: 268
 

Automatic transmissions use about 5% more fuel.

My first car a Mercedes 200 (very used... <img src=

alt=

/>) had a fantastic manual. It gave fuel mileages throughout it's speed range. Best mileage was around 30 mph or 50 km/h.

If there is a headwind, try driving at night as there is normally less wind. This will save fuel and make for a lot less road weave. Also less traffic. Also air is denser, so you have more power.

I have a question. I have never towed my Tiger on the highway but may be doing so next summer. How is it in the wind? Will be using a Toyota Rav4

Mary, the air tabs? www.airtab.com sounds like a great idea. At USD $ 2.50 each, you need 3 per foot, so for a van or truck the investment would be low. Just a matter of having to answer all the people who say...

whas dat?


 
Posted : November 12, 2006 7:35 pm
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
 
Quote
I must agree with Scarecrow. You dont need a V-8 or even a V-6 to pull a beachcat. Not even over mountains.. My Ford Focus 1.6liters is sufficient even with a Tornado+tools/spares on the trailer and camping gear in the back.

So wait, my Mountain Dew bottle is 3 litres and your engine is only 1.6?

Yet again, people telling us that we don't need our big cars.

WE KNOW WE DON'T NEED THEM. WE LIKE THEM AND THATS WHY WE HAVE THEM.

I mean jesus, I drive a 2 door, AWD gas-guzzling SUV thats about as practical as a football bat and I love it to death. I baby it. I sing lullaby's to it at night to make sure it gets to bed ok. It takes $50 to fill it up, but guess what, every penny of it is worth it because my vehicle is part of who I am.

So yeah, I don't need a 3.5 litre forced induction V6 on 32

x12

tires, but I LOVE IT AND YOU'LL HAVE TO PRY IT OUT OF MY COLD, DEAD HANDS YOU COMMIE BASTIDS!

(last line embellished for effect)


 
Posted : November 13, 2006 7:53 am
(@Anonymous 13024)
Posts: 4319
 

Yes yes, I hope you enjoy it just as much when your government buckle in to the pressure and triple the cost of gas, and put extra taxes on all fun cars. I would like to drive the same kind of car as you have, it would be great fun. But I can not afford it, and after some consideration, its not really neccesary either.

Quote
WE KNOW WE DON'T NEED THEM. WE LIKE THEM AND THATS WHY WE HAVE THEM.

So yeah, I don't need a 3.5 litre forced induction V6 on 32

x12

tires, but I LOVE IT AND YOU'LL HAVE TO PRY IT OUT OF MY COLD, DEAD HANDS YOU COMMIE BASTIDS!

Please grow up.


 
Posted : November 13, 2006 8:45 am
(@Anonymous 6548)
Posts: 1652
 
Quote
Yes yes, I hope you enjoy it just as much when your government buckle in to the pressure and triple the cost of gas, and put extra taxes on all fun cars.

One word...... Methanol
It is now cheaper than fuel. Just don't get caught with it <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : November 13, 2006 8:49 am
(@Anonymous 13024)
Posts: 4319
 

Hey Steve,

that technology is coming trough here in scandinavia as well (or better Ethanol?). Think about it, destilling your own fuel <img src=

alt=

/> Should make for some really great parties if ethanol is used, but take care to lock your fuel tank.


 
Posted : November 13, 2006 8:53 am
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
 
Quote
Please grow up.

Your tone rings of jealousy.

HAHA HAHA HA HAHAHA. Man I feel sorry for you.

Wait till they unveil the

Ford Excuse

. 37mpg, soda can sheet metal, and the briggs and stratton v2 engine!

I'm in the market actually right now for a H2 SUT. I'll have big gas guzzler and small gas guzzler!

(fwiw, my fiancee drives a 2004 honda accord. Well, she DID until she hit a pothole and bent the frame on the stupid thing)


 
Posted : November 13, 2006 9:08 am
Page 3 / 13
Secret Link