Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

Harken 10:1 mainsheet

15 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
4,382 Views
(@emmettv)
Posts: 61
Lubber Registered
Topic starter
 
[#6433]

I saw a few older conversations on updating to a 10:1 . I have a Prindle 19mx with an original 6:1 sheet. I see a great deal on a 10:1 but not sure of the advantages . I am not racing and split seconds not a concern, but I do appraciate more modern updates to the boat. I know the cons of the extra line on the tramp and the slower reaction of the line coming in or going out . Are there worth while advantages on this type of boat ? And how much line is required on these ?


 
Posted : December 25, 2017 5:41 am
MN3
 MN3
(@mn3)
Posts: 7090
Member
 

I would def suggest an upgrade to a modern block if you have the funds
8:1 is enough
9:1 nice
10:1 prob overkill if your not a racer

advantages :
more purchases = less energy needed from skipper to sheet in full sail or hold a sheeted sail (you know the cons)
lighter gear
typically lower profile (more range)
Ladies dig new gear (jk)

how much line? i dunno your boat that well but lets say 10-15% more per additional purchase?
you MIGHT be able to make up for a few purchases with a longer travler line but if your upgrading - time for a nice new tapered mainsheet too


 
Posted : December 25, 2017 6:08 am
Andres Chianale
(@Andinista)
Posts: 1228
Master Chief Registered
 

MN3 wrote:
more purchases = less energy needed from skipper to sheet in full sail or hold a sheeted sail

not exaclty
What is reduced is the force, times more sheet lenght to pull equals the same energy to sheet in.
Energy to hold the sail is 0 in both cases. Force is different


 
Posted : December 25, 2017 10:57 am
David Bonin
(@wolfman)
Posts: 1555
Member
 

I upgraded from a 7:1 to a 9:1 on my Nacra 5.7. I would never go back.


 
Posted : December 25, 2017 4:35 pm
MN3
 MN3
(@mn3)
Posts: 7090
Member
 

Andinista wrote: [quote=MN3]
more purchases = less energy needed from skipper to sheet in full sail or hold a sheeted sail

not exaclty
What is reduced is the force, times more sheet lenght to pull equals the same energy to sheet in.
Energy to hold the sail is 0 in both cases. Force is different

Technically you are correct -
i was over simplifying the terms, trying not to get too scientific

to the human at the end of the blocks: (ceteris paribus)

you can sheet all day and feel less muscle fatigue than if you had a lesser purchase system
and expend less Joules (1 kg*(m/s)^2) to hold a sheeted mainsheet in the same position over any length of time


 
Posted : December 26, 2017 3:26 am
(@lakewateree)
Posts: 195
Member
 

Just spend the Christmas money and get the new Harken GP (Grand-Prix) system. Can go 10;1, 11:1, or 12:1!

http://www.harken.com/productdetail.aspx?id=47404&taxid=8923


 
Posted : December 26, 2017 6:31 am
(@emmettv)
Posts: 61
Lubber Registered
Topic starter
 

Wow..this can double duty as as the marina boat lift on windless days .
$1500 !! Santa was not that generous . I think I'll keep with the 10:1 idea .


 
Posted : December 26, 2017 8:08 am
(@davefarmer)
Posts: 1104
Master Chief Registered
 

Sent you a pm Emmitt.

Dave


 
Posted : December 26, 2017 12:20 pm
Andres Chianale
(@Andinista)
Posts: 1228
Master Chief Registered
 

MN3 wrote:
to the human at the end of the blocks: (ceteris paribus)

you can sheet all day and feel less muscle fatigue than if you had a lesser purchase system
and expend less Joules (1 kg*(m/s)^2) to hold a sheeted mainsheet in the same position over any length of time

See it this way:
Do you feel less hungry at the end of the day? No, because you haven't spent less joules.
Your muscles feel different? Yes, because you applied less Newtons.
equal need of beer will verify that the experiment was ceteris paribus.


 
Posted : December 27, 2017 2:34 am
(@klozhald)
Posts: 1461
Master Chief Registered
 

Andinista wrote: Your muscles feel different? Yes, because you applied less Newtons.
equal need of beer will verify that the experiment was ceteris paribus.

Wait- did you say beer?


 
Posted : December 27, 2017 6:32 am
(@klozhald)
Posts: 1461
Master Chief Registered
 

uh, you lost me after "less Joules (1 kg*(m/s)^2)".
Last time I dealt with "joules" it was on a defibrillator.

I prefer this equation when talking about catamarans:
Ballast = Bikinis x Beer
I'm sure that there are values to the B3 equation above that would allow calculation of Total Fun Acquired, or Belches per Knot...

Forgive the diversion.


 
Posted : December 28, 2017 5:26 am
arch
 arch
(@arch)
Posts: 267
Member
 

i recall having a conversation with jack young of Nacra years ago regarding the dangers of having too much purchase for the sail on a cat. while it's easier to 'sheet-in' with a 10:1 than a 9:1, 8:1, 7:1, etc. he said the reason they didn't put greater purchase on boats is to reduce the chance that the mainsail could be pulled with such force as to damage the sail or 'overbend' the mast.
j


 
Posted : December 28, 2017 10:55 am
(@emmettv)
Posts: 61
Lubber Registered
Topic starter
 

I can understand this , but why then do all the performance cats now come with the 10:1 ? Capricorn, C2, Nacra 17 Olympic , Nacra 20 , Tornado..etc..etc ? Stronger Carbon masts ?


 
Posted : December 30, 2017 2:55 am
(@klozhald)
Posts: 1461
Master Chief Registered
 

emmettv wrote: Stronger Carbon masts ?

Yes, and completely different sail cloth/construction techniques on the mainsail.


 
Posted : December 30, 2017 12:34 pm
MN3
 MN3
(@mn3)
Posts: 7090
Member
 

emmettv wrote: I can understand this , but why then do all the performance cats now come with the 10:1 ? Capricorn, C2, Nacra 17 Olympic , Nacra 20 , Tornado..etc..etc ? Stronger Carbon masts ?

yes and no
Cap, C2 - older N20's and tornado's had alum masts
but bendier than older extrusions
and did not come with 10:1

plus as mentioned the cloth is very different and holds shape much longer than dacron

Edited by MN3 on Jan 01, 2018 - 10:27 AM.


 
Posted : January 1, 2018 4:26 am
Secret Link