Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

New Draft rule

102 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
185 K Views
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
Topic starter
 

Wouter said he'd finalise it and I sent the draft to him.....

If its not done soon I'll have to make time to get it done.


 
Posted : September 8, 2008 12:28 am
Luiz
 Luiz
(@luiz)
Posts: 1238
Member
 
Quote
Wouter said he'd finalise it and I sent the draft to him.....

If its not done soon I'll have to make time to get it done.

Any news? I can help if necessary.


 
Posted : September 21, 2008 10:34 pm
Gato
 Gato
(@poussiere)
Posts: 432
Mate Registered
 

It would be really goog if we could get it done. Still there is not so long to wait now before we will have reached the number of ten...


 
Posted : September 22, 2008 12:15 am
Luiz
 Luiz
(@luiz)
Posts: 1238
Member
 

Very soon, indeed. My daughter wants one. When will the Chinese Vudu become available?

Still, it doesn't hurt to have an initial rule to start with.


 
Posted : September 22, 2008 5:02 pm
Gato
 Gato
(@poussiere)
Posts: 432
Mate Registered
 

Exactly Luiz, and that was the reason why I was in favour for a simple set of rules to start with. There are people around here too who starts to ask difficult questions, like where you can buy one of these cool cats. One feels a little bit stupid telling them there is no such cat to buy, in fact it’s not really decided yet what they should comply to.


 
Posted : September 22, 2008 10:38 pm
(@wouter)
Posts: 9363
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

I got a little miffed last time I was (again) told to shut up. I haven't visited this forum since; must be 4 to 5 weeks indeed.

I confirm that Scarecrow had send me the word file and indeed, I was fully intent on working a set out and present it to you all within days. Then I got the

advice

described above in a thread that was dealing with a rule misconception. That pretty much tipped the scales for me. A guy started mouthing off about a rule change that was completely in error (he didn't read up on the progress so far) and I was told to shut up for pointing that out.

I needed only seconds to analyse the situation. For an effective class we need a more strict ruleset then the usual suspects on this forum are willing to accept or even discuss. When I point that out I get the usual abuse that many are so fond of dispensing. So, I'm insufficiently skilled to achieve succes in any other way and I don't really need anybody dissing me personally for their own failings. I'm sorry, but you can all go to hell if that is the only choice before me.

No, I don't need more then an evening to get a good F12 ruleset proposal, one that will be well balanced and provide a good foundation to base a potential succes on. That is not in any way the problem. The problem lies in the fact that I really don't feel much like having it put through the irrational wringer that is the F12 forum. I can predict what can happen already. Some Aussie will claim for the 10th time that the mossies are below 50 kg and ask why the smaller F12's will be heavier. When explained he will totally ignore the given explanation that platform weight is NOT the same as ready to sail weight and bitch that he still wants the craft to be lighter then a given weight that has no further association with what is really proposed. If I want to waste my time then I'll go and play some computer game and feel good afterwards for beating the computer !

Now what I can offer you all is a balanced ruleset that revolves around the following concepts :

Equalize drag and equalized drive through abstract rules that do not limit designers freedom in a severe way. No rules on details or materials. There will be a rule that limits the F12 to using only ONE sail in the rig without specifying its shape other then setting a max luff length and mast mast length (sail hoist height).

Balance the ruleset such that the same craft can be succesfully used by the older kids, teenagers and light to medium parents (1-up) and will be light and inexpensive.

It will not be a A-cat like open ruleset of only 4 rules, that will in my opinion only lead to a mini A-cat class that will be less performant but still cost almost the same. There is no market demand for such a class as the F14 project has shown. I will not provide such a class ruleset when asked, somebody else can burn his fingers on that, but I won't.

I too sick and tired of all the BS, bitching and other monkey behaviour to consider giving this class more then a single chance and this is it.

If you guys can find a concensus on the above principles and still want my help then I can present a good F12 rulebase within 24 hours. If not then please don't ever contact me again regarding your F12 class.

I will not came back reading these posts and you can all work it out yourselves. If you guys still want to make use of what I can offer then mail me at wouterhijink(AT)hotmail.com and I will deliver.

It is a selfprotection thing.

Regards,

Wouter


 
Posted : September 24, 2008 9:59 am
Gato
 Gato
(@poussiere)
Posts: 432
Mate Registered
 

Well, that clarified a lot. How do we proceed? Maybe Scarecrow and Luiz can knock something together? I know that you are busy, I can help, but I’m not much of a rule maker.


 
Posted : September 24, 2008 11:04 am
Luiz
 Luiz
(@luiz)
Posts: 1238
Member
 

I read the following message:

Quote
Now what I can offer you all is a balanced ruleset that revolves around the following concepts:

Equalize drag and equalized drive through abstract rules that do not limit designers freedom in a severe way. No rules on details or materials. There will be a rule that limits the F12 to using only ONE sail in the rig without specifying its shape other then setting a max luff length and mast mast length (sail hoist height).

Balance the ruleset such that the same craft can be succesfully used by the older kids, teenagers and light to medium parents (1-up) and will be light and inexpensive.

If you guys can find a concensus on the above principles and still want my help then I can present a good F12 rulebase within 24 hours.

I believe Wouter can write a very good set of rules for the class. He's been in this from the begining, has previous experience writing this stuff and his not-so-kind composition style and bilateral arguments, although unpleasant, have nothing to do with the F12 class.

This is not a kindness contest: we are looking for a good set of rules, he already has them drafted in his head and offered to write them for us.

My vote is to take his offer, get done with it and follow to the next step. We still need to struggle with the by-laws.


 
Posted : September 24, 2008 5:34 pm
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 

Stop being a primma donna Wouter, I had my say on what I thought, you gave it back to me in your usual style and someone else told you to shut up. No one gave you half as much as you give others. I shut up so that rules can be locked in and you can either do as you offered or wash your hands of the project AGAIN. If you dont want to do it Wouter I will do it so send them to me and I will modify the A Class rules to suit within 2 weeks.


 
Posted : September 24, 2008 6:37 pm
(@Anonymous 8992)
Posts: 490
 
Quote

Some Aussie will claim for the 10th time that the mossies are below 50 kg and ask why the smaller F12's will be heavier. When explained he will totally ignore the given explanation that platform weight is NOT the same as ready to sail weight and bitch that he still wants the craft to be lighter then a given weight that has no further association with what is really proposed. If I want to waste my time then I'll go and play some computer game and feel good afterwards for beating the computer !

Now what I can offer you all is a balanced ruleset that revolves around the following concepts :

Equalize drag and equalized drive through abstract rules that do not limit designers freedom in a severe way. No rules on details or materials. There will be a rule that limits the F12 to using only ONE sail in the rig without specifying its shape other then setting a max luff length and mast mast length (sail hoist height).

Balance the ruleset such that the same craft can be succesfully used by the older kids, teenagers and light to medium parents (1-up) and will be light and inexpensive.

It will not be a A-cat like open ruleset of only 4 rules, that will in my opinion only lead to a mini A-cat class that will be less performant but still cost almost the same. There is no market demand for such a class as the F14 project has shown. I will not provide such a class ruleset when asked, somebody else can burn his fingers on that, but I won't.

I too sick and tired of all the BS, bitching and other monkey behaviour to consider giving this class more then a single chance and this is it.

If you guys can find a concensus on the above principles and still want my help then I can present a good F12 rulebase within 24 hours. If not then please don't ever contact me again regarding your F12 class.

I will not came back reading these posts and you can all work it out yourselves. If you guys still want to make use of what I can offer then mail me at wouterhijink(AT)hotmail.com and I will deliver.

It is a selfprotection thing.

Regards,

Wouter

Wouter,

I have had a good read of the F12 forum, cannot see where the Mozzie at 50kg was mentioned, Arrow and AC are used as comparisons often, perhaps you are confusing this topic with a question I asked on the F16 forum? Mozzies come in around 85kg on the water, for the 11th time <img src=

alt=

/>

Darryn
Mozzie
1782


 
Posted : September 24, 2008 8:31 pm
(@Anonymous 8992)
Posts: 490
 
Quote
Stop being a primma donna Wouter, I had my say on what I thought, you gave it back to me in your usual style and someone else told you to shut up. No one gave you half as much as you give others. I shut up so that rules can be locked in and you can either do as you offered or wash your hands of the project AGAIN. If you dont want to do it Wouter I will do it so send them to me and I will modify the A Class rules to suit within 2 weeks.

Jeff,
In SA we are so far away from the rest of the sailing world that you might as well do it exactly the way you want to.

Darryn


 
Posted : September 24, 2008 8:39 pm
Gato
 Gato
(@poussiere)
Posts: 432
Mate Registered
 

Let's for once do it without Wouter, he has a lot of good qualities, but there is nothing constructive in a discussion like the one going on here for the moment.


 
Posted : September 25, 2008 1:29 am
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 

Darryn it doesnt much matter what the first rules are based on as long as we lock in the basics already agreed on. The rules as agreed say that as soon as theres enough boats on the water there can be votes on changes to the rules but won't discriminate against existing boats. I've got time on my hands for the next 2 weeks so if Scarecrow gets the draft rules to me I'll do it and if Wouter decides to do it the class can adopt which ever one is prefered in two weeks time.
regards


 
Posted : September 25, 2008 5:20 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
Topic starter
 

Jeff,

I've just gotten out of hospital after almost two weeks, and I'm over 1000km from my office with a stict no-fly ban until friday.

I'll email the files on monday.

SC


 
Posted : September 30, 2008 8:31 pm
Gato
 Gato
(@poussiere)
Posts: 432
Mate Registered
 

Very happy to have you back again, started to be scared, things have been so quiet.


 
Posted : September 30, 2008 11:41 pm
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 

Hope your getting better, I'll get on to it as soon as the files come through
regards


 
Posted : October 1, 2008 12:36 am
(@wouter)
Posts: 9363
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

I wish you excellent recovery Scarecrow !

Wouter


 
Posted : October 2, 2008 3:29 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the thoughts guys,

I went away for 4 days to visit family and ended up in emergency with pneumonia, two hospitals and two week later I'm finally home, now I just need to remember how to breath and find a way to meet all the deadlines that have slipped while I've been away.

Word is that the Catholic World Youth Day in Sydney a few months ago introduced a lot of new virus strains into Australia and cases of pneumonia and similar have gone through the roof since.


 
Posted : October 4, 2008 7:25 pm
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 

Okay I've never had a go at this sort of thing before so here is my draft of the rules have a look, post your opinion here on the forum so that any proposed changes can be debated rules to be locked in
8pm 12th day of October 2008.
Keep in mind this set of rules can be changed anytime as per the rules so this is just to get things going.
If you can do better do it <img src=

alt=

/>.
regards

F12 CLASS CATAMARAN MEASUREMENT GUIDELINES

Prologue: The Formula 12 class
The Formula 12 catamaran exists with the sole purpose of introducing young, novice and disabled sailors to the thrills of sailing high performance catamarans. With this in mind the following rules endeavor to outline a cost effective, safe and enjoyable class of sailing boat that can also be used for close racing across a range of designs.

The Formula 12 Design Box Rule
1. In case of doubt, the intention of the rule makers, which is referred to as the spirit of the rule, shall take precedence over the letter of the rule. For construction, all materials and methods are allowed when these do not imply either an unacceptable risk of bodily harm or the operation of an unseaworthy craft. It is the responsibility of competitors to ensure their craft are safe and seaworthy.

2. A catamaran is defined as a two-hulled sailing boat with essentially duplicate or mirror image hulls, fixed in parallel positions.

3. Sail area shall not be more than: 7.00 square metres. There is no restriction on how sail area is distributed. Where a sleeved main sail is not used, half the mast area shall be included in the total sail area. “The girth measurement shall be taken as the distance from the centreline round the surface of the spar to the same point on the centreline. The resultant dimension shall be divided by two to give the half girth measurement.”
Boom measurement is only included in the sail area if the profile height of the boom is more than 1.5 of the width and shall be taken as per mast measurement.
When undertaking the sail measurement the following points should be noted.
Sail to be measured on a flat surface and laid out in terms of IYRU Measurement & Calculation of Sail Area Instructions. i.e.
“With battens set in their pockets the sail shall be pegged out on a flat surface with just sufficient tension to remove waves or wrinkles from the edge rounds and to spread the sail, as far as possible, substantially flat. Once the sail has been pegged out in this way all the required measurements shall be taken and no alterations to the tensions shall be made.”

4. Mast construction and rigging shall be un-restricted.
A contrasting measurement band shall be located on the mast no higher than 6metres above the top of the front beam. At no time shall any part of the main sail with the exception of a halyard lock or shackle be located above this measurement band.

5. The overall length of the catamaran shall not be more than: 3.80 metres.
The length shall be measured between perpendiculars to the extremities of the hulls with
the catamaran in her normal trim. The measurement shall be taken parallel to the centre
line of the craft and shall exclude rudder hangings, but if the athwartships width of a
rudder within 153mm (6 inches) of the bottom of the hull is more than 76mm (3 inches), the length shall be taken to the aftermost point of the rudder.

6. The extreme beam width shall not be more than: 2.00 metres
The beam shall be measured at right angles to the centre line of the craft at the widest point and including all fixed or adjustable apparatus with the exception of a normally accepted trapeze or retractable seat, this may be at some point down the sides of the hulls, especially if hulls are angled. It may also be possible that the maximum width is at the bottom of centreboards when fully down.

7. Unballasted retractable seat or trapeze shall be allowed for the helmsperson. When in use the helmsperson at all times shall have at least one foot in contact with the boat.

8. Each hull shall have at least one inspection hatch.

9. Each hull shall carry at least 30 litres of flotation, which may be provided by solid closed cell foam, solid blocks of compacted foam granulate, air bags or sealed air compartments.

10. The platform shall be equipped with a pair of rudders.

11. In addition to the rudders, the platform may also be equipped with one or more daggerboards or centerboards.

12. It is not permitted to adjust the following items while racing: the rake of the mast, the tension of the standing rigging, the angle or length of the spreaders (if fitted).

13. It is the responsibility of the crew to ensure that the boat is equipped with a righting system that will enable the crew to right the boat without any outside assistance.

14. The Formula 12 Class authority may demand that a crew demonstrate their ability to right their boat, but only at a time when doing so does not directly affect the fairness of racing.

15. There will be no other restrictions on crew weight apart from the requirement that the crew weight must be sufficient to right the boat unaided under all encountered sailing conditions.

16. The F12 Division emblem shall be carried on the mainsail over national letters and sail numbers, Sail numbers shall be allotted by the Class Association.

17. Hydrofoils are not permitted.

18. Minimum weight in full sailing trim shall be not less than 50 kilograms. The boat must be weighed in a dry condition and any weights attached to bring the boat to a minimum weight of 50 kilograms must be permanently affixed.

Class administration
19.1. Voting rights
The following people area each entitled to one vote on class matters.
o Designers who have provided a free design of a F12 for others of which at least one has been built.
o Builders who have built at least one boat ready to sail.
o Owners of a ready to sail F12 cat
19.2.a Changing of rules
A change to these rules requires affirmative votes from 2/3 of all people entitled to vote at the time of the poll.
19.2.b Rule changes may not preclude from competition or grandfather currently sailed F12 catamarans.
19.3. Applicability of rules
These rules exist as a draft only until being ratified or changed by vote after the launch of the 10th Formula 12 catamaran.
19.4.a. Governing body
Initially the Formula 12 catamaran class shall be run with all those entitles to vote having equal voting rights. Upon the launch and measurement of the 49th vessel the class association may with a 2/3 majority vote choose to implement a governing council which will be empowered to handle the general running of the class.
19.4.b. Where a governing council is adopted they may not make changes to the measurement box rule or voting structure, with out first receiving 2/3 majority support for any changes.


 
Posted : October 7, 2008 8:37 pm
ncik
 ncik
(@nickb)
Posts: 935
Master Chief Registered
 

Notes

4. Pocket luff sails will extend beyond the top of the mast, hence above the measurement band.

7. I thought trapezes (or seats) were not part of the intention of the F12. I don't think they sit well with the philosophy of the F12. Safety is also a concern for solo kids getting trapeze hooks stuck if under the tramp. I also don't believe they are necessary for performance.

17. I agree that hydrofoils should be banned. However I think a blanket statement as such is poor wording. We've seen so much debate about the definition of hydrofoils and their banning in the A-Class. I won't go into all the problems associated with it. This can be avoided with a requirement for one hull to be providing buoyancy in all typical sailing conditions, ie. one hull in the water at all times while racing.

If that is considered too tricky, an alternative requirement for

straight

blades fitted

vertically

may be appropriate.

Otherwise I would vote for the proposed rules.


 
Posted : October 7, 2008 9:06 pm
(@simonp)
Posts: 189
Member
 

Good work Jeff.

Do think it is too early to build one for my sons, they are 2 1/2 and 10 months.

The oldest own is pretty excited about sailing on the F16. 1-4 knots ans 29degrees C has been forecast for our clubs opening day this saturday, might be the perfect day for him.


 
Posted : October 7, 2008 9:19 pm
(@retiredgeek)
Posts: 251
Mate Registered
 

Jeff, excellent work, nice and simple without all the wordy stuff in the original rule Wouter proposed.
Like ncik noted, allowance for the top strap of a pocket luff sail or a fully enclosed pocket, Traps I don't mind, but might be an issue with really young kids till they get the hang of it, and the hydrofoil issue can be dealt with as ncik suggested with straight blades and mounted vertically to the hull center line (this allows for canted hulls)

Cheers
RG


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 12:10 am
Gato
 Gato
(@poussiere)
Posts: 432
Mate Registered
 

Nice work!!! For the traps I agree with ncik. For a start they should not be allowed when racing, we can add them later if they becomes something used by the kids sailing and racing with the cat.
But traps or not you have my vote.


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 1:28 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
Topic starter
 

Good job Jeff, I'm happy with the tweeks proposed above. I'm on the fence on traps. I started trapping at about 6 and competed in a hobie 18 nationals at 12 so I know from experiance kids can do it. However I wonder if they will scare some parents away.

[Linked Image]


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 2:42 am
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 
Quote
Notes

4. Pocket luff sails will extend beyond the top of the mast, hence above the measurement band.

7. I thought trapezes (or seats) were not part of the intention of the F12. I don't think they sit well with the philosophy of the F12. Safety is also a concern for solo kids getting trapeze hooks stuck if under the tramp. I also don't believe they are necessary for performance.

17. I agree that hydrofoils should be banned. However I think a blanket statement as such is poor wording. We've seen so much debate about the definition of hydrofoils and their banning in the A-Class. I won't go into all the problems associated with it. This can be avoided with a requirement for one hull to be providing buoyancy in all typical sailing conditions, ie. one hull in the water at all times while racing.

If that is considered too tricky, an alternative requirement for

straight

blades fitted

vertically

may be appropriate.

Otherwise I would vote for the proposed rules.

Whats the correct wording regarding the pocket luffs extending past the mast band?
I'm putting a trap and jib on mine but I can take them off if the kids race in a F12 comp so I dont mind banning them in the racing rules. I personally think that kids want an exciting boat why not have a trap if they've already been using one for the last 3 years on a mono. My 8yo has a cat with a trap, are we saying that a 11yo kid that is a good sailor looking for excitement should get a different boat. The seat wasn't about performance I felt that this is an interesting platform for disadvantaged sailors, I cant imagine a seat or wing being used but why ban it.
We can addopt the one hull in the water wording.
I'll happily go along with whatever everyboady wants lets just lock in some rules <img src=

alt=

/>.
regards


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 2:50 am
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 

You posted while I was typing Scarecrow glad your back in the land of the living. As I said in the early post I'll go along with whatever everyone wants in the rules. <img src=

alt=

/>
regards


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 2:59 am
 grob
(@grob)
Posts: 541
Chief Registered
 
Quote
10. The platform shall be equipped with a pair of rudders.

Would it be possible to ammend this to allow for a single central rudder, I beleive this was in previous drafts. It also sits better with rule 11 that allows

one or more daggerboards or centerboards.

Thanks

Gareth


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 5:01 am
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 

I nearly put in the wording a maximum of 2 rudders and I think its a great idea
regards


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 5:14 am
(@Anonymous 15703)
Posts: 1312
 

Its been pointed out to me that we need to list the F12 designs that can vote on the rules as the way its written anybody with an established cat smaller than the F12 max dimensions can vote so the dedicated F12 designs would have no say. Can we please have a current list of builders and designs and can anybody put together the correct words that includes the ability to add new designs as they come along
regards


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 6:16 pm
ncik
 ncik
(@nickb)
Posts: 935
Master Chief Registered
 

Rewording for Rule 4

4. Mast construction and rigging shall be un-restricted.
A contrasting measurement band shall be located on the mast no higher than 6metres above the top of the front beam. At no time shall any part of the main sail with the exception of a halyard lock, shackle or pocket luff sail cap be located above this measurement band.

Some sketches of each of these conditions may be appropriate.

Thinking about it some more, for junior boats I really like the idea of being able to drop the sails with the boat and mast upright for safety reasons. Should shackled or pocket luff sails be allowed with this consideration. Having sailed a pocket luffed moth and knowing how difficult it is to be rescued with the mast still up, I am very tempted to have a clause to cover this.


 
Posted : October 8, 2008 6:20 pm
Page 2 / 4
Secret Link