Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

blade f18 mk1 for sale

24 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
5,897 Views
(@Anonymous 39109)
Posts: 191
Topic starter
 
[#18725]

We have blade mk1 that was damaged (can be fixed) in a huge nose dive in shallow water it is platform only 2 hulls beams tramp travler and track and self tacker. port hull is missing about 1 meter off the bow and starbord hull has hole in where i put my foot through trying to rescue my brother hull are made of 4mm ply so if you are handy you would be able to fix with not much effort and have very competitive f18. also have pictures of the above damage so if interested please contact me at jdanny@internode.on.net price is very neg would like cost of fittings if possible thanks danny PS boat is in adelaide australia


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 1:12 am
(@Anonymous 39109)
Posts: 191
Topic starter
 

other hull


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 1:14 am
 Trey
(@NCSUtrey)
Posts: 813
Chief Registered
 

Fix? <img src=

alt=

/>

And I'm sure you paid Rick for the classified ad, right?


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 10:22 am
Cookie Monster
(@cookie-monster)
Posts: 284
Member
 

Looks more like an anchor than a boat!


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 1:25 pm
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
 

looks like it'll buff out.

what are you talkin bout? 😛


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 1:53 pm
hobie1616
(@hobie1616)
Posts: 2117
Captain Registered
 

A little Marine Tex, some bondo, a can of Great Stuff and it'll be better than new.


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 1:59 pm
Tony_F18
(@Tony_FX1)
Posts: 2315
Captain Registered
 

Nothing a little ducttape cant fix!


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 2:41 pm
(@stank)
Posts: 5061
One Star Admiral Registered
 

Those pictures bring up a question... Do any beachcats have a second

bow

behind the first one, like the big boats, that will keep them from sinking if their bow crunches on something? Would something like that be easy to design? Would it add too much weight?


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 2:46 pm
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

You're talking about a crash box. I've never seen one on a cat - but we're rarely far enough out to require such a thing. It would add some complexity to the build and a little weight, but not that big of a deal. I've often considered building one behind daggerboard wells for the distance racing boats.


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 2:56 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

The F18 rule does however require some reserve bouyancy:

B.1.2. Flotation

Each hull shall carry at least 110 litres of flotation, by solid closed foam, air bags, sealed air compartments in hulls, and at least one inspection hatch.


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 3:21 pm
(@stilettodude)
Posts: 805
Member
 

Each hull shall carry at least 110 litres of flotation,

But I think that would escape through the missing bow section don't you? <img src=

alt=

/>

Clayton


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 3:24 pm
C2 Mike
(@TigerMike)
Posts: 329
Mate Registered
 
Quote

Each hull shall carry at least 110 litres of flotation,

But I think that would escape through the missing bow section don't you? <img src=

alt=

/>

Clayton

Can't speak for other boats but the Tiger has it behind the daggerboard case more or less where the skipper stands. You would have to break the boat in half for it to escape from there. Even if you had it in the bow section, and you broke off the nose, the bow would be pointing down (probably) causing the bouyancy to float to the rear of the boat.

Tiger Mike


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 3:38 pm
(@Anonymous 14038)
Posts: 1358
 

Jake,
You could put a watertight bulkhead between the main beam and centrecase that you can get to from an inspection port behind the main beam. (That is provided your boat has an inspection port behind the main beam.)
This bulkhead can then have a bung in the bottom of it and
normal hatch port in the top. This would allow any water entering the hull forward to drain to the rear by releasing the bung and when the boat is not being sailed you can undo the hatch to allow normal air circulation in the hull.

Regards,
Phill


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 3:39 pm
(@Anonymous 37740)
Posts: 433
 

I gotta hear more <img src=

alt=

/> <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 3:39 pm
(@Anonymous 76)
Posts: 359
 
Quote
And I'm sure you paid Rick for the classified ad, right?

That's no ad, that's a

Y'all ain't gonna believe we lived

story.


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 9:44 pm
 robi
(@robi)
Posts: 2686
Captain Registered
 

This is the only forum I frequent that people will post non internet friendly images. And by that I mean, resolutions that are closer to 2000 X 2300 pixels in size.

Does anyone here KNOW anything about resizing to something more easily viewable like say 800 X 600? Not only is it quicker to download, but it will save massive space on the forums server, creating less bandwidth usage and much less stress.

How about those sideways images! You folks crack me up!


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 10:03 pm
(@Anonymous 6548)
Posts: 1652
 
Quote
Quote

Each hull shall carry at least 110 litres of flotation,

But I think that would escape through the missing bow section don't you? <img src=

alt=

/>

Clayton

Can't speak for other boats but the Tiger has it behind the daggerboard case more or less where the skipper stands. You would have to break the boat in half for it to escape from there. Even if you had it in the bow section, and you broke off the nose, the bow would be pointing down (probably) causing the bouyancy to float to the rear of the boat.

Tiger Mike

Capricorn the same......


 
Posted : October 30, 2006 11:10 pm
(@Anonymous 39109)
Posts: 191
Topic starter
 

for those interested the boat has sealed compartment behind front beam. yes we lived only damage was boat and a left knee wich is still repairing 12 months later we sailed boat as you see it for about one kilometer to a beach where me met a farmer who gave us beers until we were picked up. the beer made me feel better and numbed the pain.


 
Posted : October 31, 2006 1:35 am
(@Anonymous 38278)
Posts: 450
 

Where's the missing bow section?


 
Posted : October 31, 2006 2:06 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
This is the only forum I frequent that people will post non internet friendly images. And by that I mean, resolutions that are closer to 2000 X 2300 pixels in size.

Does anyone here KNOW anything about resizing to something more easily viewable like say 800 X 600? Not only is it quicker to download, but it will save massive space on the forums server, creating less bandwidth usage and much less stress.

How about those sideways images! You folks crack me up!

I like the high-res photos as long as they remain as attachments.


 
Posted : October 31, 2006 6:53 am
(@Anonymous 13024)
Posts: 4319
 

I also like hi-res photos, as long as they are attached and not

in-line

.

I was wondering about how I would repair such a damage to a compounded plywood boat. The hole in the bow I can see a way to fix, but rebuilding a bow from scratch? Sounds like a major operation to me where it would be easier to build a new hull. Or ?
From the pictures it looks like the ply has been exposed to sun and weather for some time..

Was the broken bow due to hitting the bottom? Are the materials and construction method at their limits since it broke that way, or was it due to stress in an unanticipated direction? I suppose the boat was sturdily buildt to meet the F-18 min. weight.


 
Posted : October 31, 2006 7:12 am
(@stank)
Posts: 5061
One Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
This is the only forum I frequent that people will post non internet friendly images. And by that I mean, resolutions that are closer to 2000 X 2300 pixels in size.

Does anyone here KNOW anything about resizing to something more easily viewable like say 800 X 600? Not only is it quicker to download, but it will save massive space on the forums server, creating less bandwidth usage and much less stress.

How about those sideways images! You folks crack me up!

Sorry, robi. I sail, I don't work on computers <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : October 31, 2006 8:58 am
(@wouter)
Posts: 9363
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
I suppose the boat was sturdily buildt to meet the F-18 min. weight.

A load baring marine ply core and glass layered on both the inside and outside. Pretty much a sandwhich construction but with ply instead of foam. In effect, it was overbuild with respect to other ply boats, made possible by the high weight limits of the F18 class.

Wouter


 
Posted : October 31, 2006 9:04 am
Marcus F16
(@artdomain305)
Posts: 305
Member
 

Wouter is 100% correct regarding construction.

I was competing alongside the owner of the boat when it was damaged. This event was caused thru bad judgement & reckless sailing. As builder of this boat, the hulls can be repaired, but I doubt you would stuff around unless you are looking for a cheap F18 platform that was a prototype.

The missing bow is probably still stuck in the mud & now probably home to the famous

carp

in lake alexandrina.


 
Posted : October 31, 2006 9:21 am
Secret Link