Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

Infusion on Video

32 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
11.4 K Views
TEAMVMG
(@TEAMVMG)
Posts: 1188
Master Chief Registered
Topic starter
 
[#16713]

The video of the prototype INFUSION is at http://www.nacraeurope.com/news_details.php?id=5


 
Posted : December 5, 2005 3:39 pm
(@stank)
Posts: 5061
One Star Admiral Registered
 

Is anyone going to distribute a polar chart for this boat?

Also, when watching the spinnaker portion of the video, I noticed the bows were out of the water most of the time. Is this the proper boat trim for this model?


 
Posted : December 5, 2005 4:01 pm
(@wouter)
Posts: 9363
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

Quote
Also, when watching the spinnaker portion of the video, I noticed the bows were out of the water most of the time. Is this the proper boat trim for this model?

Of course I have no first hand knowledge of the Infusion F18, but I can tell you that the other Flyer A-cat inspired boats like the Capricorn F18, Blade F18 and Blade F16 are all reported to be sailed best under spinnaker with the bow out of the water. This appears to make them faster. It was not expected, nor envisioned during the design stages, but in real life testing it proved to work well. Some people think it has something to do with the "reduced volume in the wvepiercer bows", but actually the bouyancy was never reduced here; if anything it was increased. The explanations are still various. Some say the wide keels allow planing others say that it reduces pitching even more because the wave contact the hulls rather away from the bows. There is no concensus apart from the fact that these new hulls like to be sailed out of the water with their bows when sailing at speed under their spinnaker.

Maybe it is just a way to reduce wetted surface area because the new hullshapes depress their sterns much less than the older shapes and thus suffer only a mild penalty in wave-making drag. More testing and theorizing is required

Wouter


 
Posted : December 5, 2005 5:13 pm
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
 

looks pretty seksy to me.

looks kinda wet too. I was looking for the "wave-piercing" effect that Jake referenced in the other thread, and you can see it in this video where they'd ride up one wave and just plow through the next.

Pretty cool.


 
Posted : December 5, 2005 5:14 pm
(@stank)
Posts: 5061
One Star Admiral Registered
 

Well, I guess it doesn't have "displacement" hulls in the traditional sense where waterline governs speed... But I'm far from being any sort of engineer...


 
Posted : December 5, 2005 6:09 pm
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

Hey....I recognize that flowery red rash guard...nice form Dan!

I also really like what they've done with the fairing just before the main beam. It grates my nerves when I can feel water smashing into the front beam on most other catamarans including the I20.


 
Posted : December 5, 2005 9:13 pm
(@Anonymous 14944)
Posts: 989
 

Having the bows out with spinnaker relieves the helm, makes it more responsive to steering (less likely to lee helm as well) and just seems to go faster with less likelyhood of "pitching" if the bows are driven through the water.


 
Posted : December 5, 2005 11:47 pm
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
 

Yeha jake,

now instead of splashing up into the air, its redirected straight into your eyes!


 
Posted : December 6, 2005 8:41 am
(@Anonymous 13024)
Posts: 4319
 
Quote
Having the bows out with spinnaker relieves the helm, makes it more responsive to steering (less likely to lee helm as well) and just seems to go faster with less likelyhood of "pitching" if the bows are driven through the water.

Darryl.

The first part seems natural, as you effectively rake the rig more aft.
The "go faster" bit, wouldn't that be largely dependent on the type of hull you have? Would this be valid for eg. the Mosquitos and Tornados also?

I have a DVD, with among others, Mitch and Herbie sailing their T. I always tought they had their weight rather far aft, but perhaps you just pointed out why to me..


 
Posted : December 6, 2005 9:23 am
(@Dan_DeLave)
Posts: 956
Master Chief Registered
 

I was sailing the boat in the video. I was crewing for Pete Melvin. I am in the red rash guard.

Dan


 
Posted : December 7, 2005 10:02 pm
TEAMVMG
(@TEAMVMG)
Posts: 1188
Master Chief Registered
Topic starter
 

Dan, what were Petes thoughts on the boat? I know he is only going to be possitive, but as someone who has one on order, I am after all the info I can get.
How did it compare to the F18 that you were trialing with?
Are we to see pete on the European F18 circuit this season?

Paul


 
Posted : December 8, 2005 12:42 pm
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
now instead of splashing up into the air, its redirected straight into your eyes!

Not if your windward hull is skimming the water like it's supposed to.


 
Posted : December 8, 2005 1:19 pm
Gary
 Gary
(@hobiegary)
Posts: 826
Chief Registered
 

I have not been able to access the video or the nacraeurope web site. Is there another location where I may access this video?

Thanks,

GARY


 
Posted : December 8, 2005 2:23 pm
(@Dan_DeLave)
Posts: 956
Master Chief Registered
 

Gary - I had a bit of trouble with the video as well. I updated my Quicktime on my PC and voila it was there. Did you already try this? I was going to bring it into my video editor and make an NTSC copy (it is in PAL) but the only conversion program I found that worked left a watermark in it. If someone has another suggestion I will take it.

Paul - Pete likes the boat. To tell you the truth he seems to like all the boats he sails and especially the ones he designs. My opinion, comparing it to the F18, is that it seems to be able to carry more weight on it. The position that you sail the boat to weather is a bit back from what I am used to. Pete kept asking be to get back bit. As a crew I was behind the shroud and Pete was as close as he could get next to me. This of course helps with the pitching of the boat. Normally as a skipper I am planted about where I was as a crew on this boat, so that is about shoulder-with back. Most of us sailing both boats thought that the newer one had a slight advantage to weather and a substantial advantage downwind. You will still have to go the right way on the course as you do not have the Ferrarri compared to the moped. The downwind advantage seems to be the way the boat handles more than anything. You will be able to take advantage of the wind and swell with more swiftness. This can be a disadvantage to those that do not keep the tiller still enough to let the boat can get up and go.

Pete mostly sails his A-Cat. I do not think he is likely to show up at too many events even here. I have tried to talk him into the Formula 18 Worlds in France. He did not say no. Maybe if Jay Glaser showed interested in crewing he would go.

Later,
Dan


 
Posted : December 8, 2005 3:16 pm
Gary
 Gary
(@hobiegary)
Posts: 826
Chief Registered
 

Damit Dan, I was really looking foreard to seeing you in your red skivies.

Quote
I was sailing the boat in the video. I was crewing for Pete Melvin. I am in the red rash guard.

Dan

I can not get to any part of that nacraeurope site. I have tried different browsers. Forget about what codecs or viewers I have; I can't even get the home page at that site. And I do believe that my player is upgraded too.

Dan, are you the guy who came ashore at Belmont Shore's Claremont beach when we had a fun event known as Catapalooza last year? There was a guy and his father who had just taken delivery of a Nacra F18.

GARY

[Linked Image]


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 1:07 am
(@Anonymous 27)
Posts: 213
 

Gary,
I just tried to get there and it loaded up right away and started playing the video. I can also ping the website from my pc and a tracert takes 19 hops to get to the site from here. If you can ping or traceroute to the site try and lower your web security settings - the site plays a quicktime video automatically and maybe your settings are blocking it. Not sure if that's it but it's worth a try.
Good Luck,


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 1:54 am
Johnny
(@zind)
Posts: 3
Member
 

Hi there,

I'm the webmaster of nacraeurope.com and it seems a lot of you can't reach the website (from America). We are trying to fix the problem, and I hope you can help me with it.

Could anyone who can't reach the website do the following (using windows):
Start -> Run -> cmd
tracert nacraeurope.com

Could you send the result (right click -> mark) as a personal message to me? This info would be very helpful to tackle this problem!

If anyone has other problems with the movie, please let me know.

greetings, John


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 3:09 am
(@Anonymous 27)
Posts: 213
 

Here's a successful one from the Tampa (FL) area.

>tracert nacraeurope.com
Tracing route to nacraeurope.com [212.203.14.37]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.103.192.1
2 9 ms 10 ms 9 ms gig1-0.tampflerl-rtr2.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.15.
1]
3 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms pos6-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr4.tampabay.rr.com [65
.32.8.137]
4 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms pop2-tby-P0-1.atdn.net [66.185.136.185]
5 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms bb1-tby-P0-3.atdn.net [66.185.138.208]
6 28 ms 27 ms 27 ms bb2-atm-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.245]
7 27 ms 27 ms 27 ms pop1-atm-P4-1.atdn.net [66.185.150.3]
8 60 ms 59 ms 59 ms so-5-2-0.mpr1.atl6.us.above.net [209.249.119.241
]
9 60 ms 59 ms 59 ms so-3-1-0.mpr2.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.29.62]
10 62 ms 61 ms 59 ms so-5-2-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.29.18]
11 60 ms 59 ms 59 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.28.209]
12 59 ms 59 ms 60 ms so-4-0-0.cr1.ord2.us.above.net [64.125.30.246]
13 60 ms 59 ms 59 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.ord2.us.above.net [64.125.29.186]
14 71 ms 70 ms 70 ms so-3-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.27.18]
15 141 ms 142 ms 141 ms so-6-0-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [64.125.31.185]
16 144 ms 141 ms 141 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.146]

17 153 ms 153 ms 156 ms so-7-0-0.mpr1.ams5.nl.above.net [64.125.27.178]

18 161 ms 168 ms 155 ms Essent.bb.amsix-tc1.ge-10-0.bgp.above.net [82.98
.250.186]
19 155 ms 153 ms 154 ms snoek.eatserver.nl [212.203.14.37]

Trace complete.


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 3:28 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

I am ruuning XP Pro and Explorer 6.0.
Running Video

Crashed first time and locked up Explorer. Secound time it ran. Maybe there is a bug?

Doug


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 3:46 am
Johnny
(@zind)
Posts: 3
Member
 

Hi Doug,

mhh that's not good IE is crashing on the movie. It's programmed to show the movie if Quicktime player is installed on your computer and if not quicktime player is installed, you should get a message to download a plugin.
If you download the movie from Nacra F18 Infusion and watch it, do you get also an error?

John


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 4:46 am
scooby_simon
(@simonJlongstaff)
Posts: 3496
Captain Registered
 

Jonny,

What is your outbound bandwidth ?

I'm truying to down load and I am only getting 400(approx) kbs. I should be able to take it down at 2.5+ times that rate - Maybe you need to get some more bandwidth from your ISP / Hosting company.


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 8:13 am
Johnny
(@zind)
Posts: 3
Member
 

Simon,

I have got no id what the bandwith is of our hosting provider. I'm currently downloading the file with 200+ KB/s (1 mb/5 sec). The server for the movie is located in the US, (gisol.com). I think the upload isn't a big bottleneck for now. If I watch te movie the download is 3x times faster than the file is playing.


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 8:41 am
(@mystere50xl)
Posts: 863
Chief Registered
 

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\David>tracert nacraeurope.com

Tracing route to nacraeurope.com [212.203.14.37]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 35 ms 26 ms 53 ms L100.DSL-02.TAMPFL.verizon-gni.net [71.98.160.1]

2 25 ms 26 ms 25 ms P2-3.LCR-01.TAMPFL.verizon-gni.net [130.81.34.14
8]
3 58 ms 58 ms 59 ms 130.81.10.94
4 58 ms 58 ms 58 ms 130.81.15.42
5 60 ms 62 ms 60 ms so-4-0-0.mpr1.iad2.us.above.net [64.125.30.118]

6 60 ms 60 ms 60 ms so-4-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.29.133]

7 61 ms 61 ms 60 ms so-6-0-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.27.210]
8 132 ms 132 ms 132 ms so-6-0-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [64.125.27.166]
9 144 ms 145 ms 149 ms so-7-0-0.mpr1.ams5.nl.above.net [64.125.27.178]

10 * * * Request timed out.
11 * * * Request timed out.


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 9:22 am
scooby_simon
(@simonJlongstaff)
Posts: 3496
Captain Registered
 

Ummm....

Thing is that I am seeing the server as the bottle neck - I have a 10MB connection so I sphould be able to get somewhere near that D/L from the server is the states (assuming the trans-pond link is OK).

I've just done 3 D/L (local) speeds and I get:

1,

Quote
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:00:35 UTC
1st 128K took 15 ms = 8738133 Bytes/sec = approx 72701 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec
4th 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec

2,

Quote
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:00:49 UTC
1st 128K took 125 ms = 1048576 Bytes/sec = approx 8724 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 125 ms = 1048576 Bytes/sec = approx 8724 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 110 ms = 1191564 Bytes/sec = approx 9914 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 140 ms = 936229 Bytes/sec = approx 7789 kbits/sec

3,

Quote
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:02:04 UTC
1st 128K took 16 ms = 8192000 Bytes/sec = approx 68157 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec
4th 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec

4, tried to tracert:

Quote
C:\>tracert nacraeurope.com

Tracing route to nacraeurope.com [212.203.14.37]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 6 ms 8 ms 7 ms 10.251.79.254
2 6 ms 8 ms 9 ms lutn-t2cam1-b-v116.inet.ntl.com [80.4.118.153]
3 7 ms 8 ms 8 ms lutn-t2core-b-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com [213.107.47.
205]
4 42 ms 10 ms 10 ms nth-bb-b-so-310-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.65]

5 9 ms 12 ms 9 ms pop-bb-a-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.14]

6 9 ms 10 ms 9 ms pop-bb-b-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.77]
7 17 ms 24 ms 19 ms amst-ic-1-as0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.94]
8 19 ms 19 ms 27 ms bb2-ge-2-0-0.amsix-telecity.home.nl [195.69.144.
103]
9 30 ms 19 ms 19 ms snoek.eatserver.nl [212.203.14.37]

Trace complete.

C:\>ping www.nacraeurope.com

Pinging www.nacraeurope.com [212.203.14.37] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.203.14.37: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=57
Request timed out.
Reply from 212.203.14.37: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=57
Reply from 212.203.14.37: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 212.203.14.37:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 19ms

C:\>ping www.nacraeurope.com

Pinging www.nacraeurope.com [212.203.14.37] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.203.14.37: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=57
Reply from 212.203.14.37: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=57
Reply from 212.203.14.37: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=57
Reply from 212.203.14.37: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 212.203.14.37:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 23ms, Average = 19ms

C:\>


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 9:25 am
(@davea)
Posts: 809
Chief Registered
 

http://www.nacra.ca


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 10:16 am
(@davea)
Posts: 809
Chief Registered
 

Hi Dan,
Do you feel that the bows up sailing style is faster? Did you try sailing it with regular f18 style weight distribution? It looks like they are going for a semi-planing hull shape..


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 10:28 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

John:

I downloaded it from this link.

http://www.nacraeurope.com/news_details.php?id=5

I don't use Quicktime. Use Windows Media Player 10.

If you ever get a mov you can't play you can get a classic version of Meida Player from the net. I used it to play the 3 Amigos video from thebeachcats.

Doug


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 2:01 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

I just tried it at this link.

http://www.nacraeurope.com/news_details.php?id=5

Only took a few secounds to download and run.

Problem must be with your connection.

I use Road Runner.

Doug


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 2:06 pm
(@Dan_DeLave)
Posts: 956
Master Chief Registered
 
Quote
From hobiegary
Dan, are you the guy who came ashore at Belmont Shore's Claremont beach when we had a fun event known as Catapalooza last year? There was a guy and his father who had just taken delivery of a Nacra F18.

Gary: The boat that came in at Catapalooza was Steve Myrter and his dad. I was with Eileen on the water on the Tiger but did not want to get all kinds of sand in the boat. We launch from inside the bay at ABYC. Although, I was at the beach before that to see if there was anything going on that I had to know about.

Quote
From PitchpoleDave
Hi Dan,
Do you feel that the bows up sailing style is faster? Did you try sailing it with regular f18 style weight distribution? It looks like they are going for a semi-planing hull shape..

Dave: No generally speaking I do not think that “bows out the water” is faster, on my boat (Tiger). Pete designed his boat to carry weight a little further back and it does seem to work with this boat (Infusion). Took me about 2½ minutes to get used to it, but it was comfortable enough. As far as getting the boat to plane, the feel of the boat is that it does seem to get up out of the water a bit with speed on the downwind run. Pete did not strictly design it as a planer, but there was some thought put into the concept.

Later,
Dan


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 2:35 pm
Gary
 Gary
(@hobiegary)
Posts: 826
Chief Registered
 

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C>tracert nacraeurope.com

Tracing route to nacraeurope.com [212.203.14.37]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms dslrouter [192.159.1.1]
2 23 ms 22 ms 23 ms L100.DSL-12.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [71.105.64.1]

3 22 ms 22 ms 22 ms 130.81.35.0
4 44 ms 34 ms 34 ms so-7-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.SJC80.verizon-gni.net [130.
81.17.135]
5 34 ms 34 ms 34 ms 130.81.15.46
6 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms so-0-0-0.mpr1.sjc7.us.above.net [64.125.30.169]

7 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms so-5-0-0.mpr4.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.30.178]

8 98 ms 98 ms 98 ms so-2-3-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.29.50]
9 98 ms 98 ms 98 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.28.210]
10 104 ms 105 ms 104 ms so-3-2-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.28.206]
11 177 ms 177 ms 176 ms so-6-0-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [64.125.27.166]
12 190 ms 190 ms 189 ms so-7-0-0.mpr1.ams5.nl.above.net [64.125.27.178]

13 * * * Request timed out.
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 * * * Request timed out.
17 *


 
Posted : December 9, 2005 2:45 pm
Page 1 / 2
Secret Link