Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

IPX8 Watertight water rating?

11 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
13.4 K Views
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
Topic starter
 
[#19570]

Does anyone have any insight on how

water tight

an IPX8 rating is? I'm investigating a new insulin pump, and all of the ones I'm looking at have a

durability rating

or something. The one I'm particularly interested in (http://www.myomnipod.com/products/section/188) has an IPX8 rating. Now I know a lot of our GPS's have a water tight rating, and that many of us have put that rating to the test. The firehose treatment we can get while on the boat is something that can't quite be measured. If anyone has any experiences with blowing up an IPX8 device while sailing, I'd like to hear it so I can ask the sales rep about it.

Thanks!


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 7:34 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

Actually, there is a firehose rating. IPX8 is about as good as it gets. However, there is some wiggle room in that I've seen components to meet IPX7 but not IPX5 - the rating scale is not necessarily sequential.

Quote
IP stands for

ingress protection

. The following digits ('characteristic numerals') indicate conformity with the conditions summarized in the tables below. Where there is no protection rating with regard to one of the criteria, the digit is replaced with the letter X.

First digit

The First digit indicates the level of protection that the enclosure provides against access to hazardous parts (e.g., electrical conductors, moving parts) and the ingress of solid foreign objects.

Level Object size protected against Effective against
0 — no protection against contact and ingress of objects
1 >50 mm any large surface of the body, such as the back of a hand, but no protection against deliberate contact with a body part
2 >12.5 mm
fingers or similar objects
3 >2.5 mm
tools, thick wires, etc.
4 >1 mm
most wires, screws, etc.
5 dust protected
ingress of dust is not entirely prevented, but it must not enter in sufficient quantity to interfere with the satisfactory operation of the equipment; complete protection against contact
6 dust tight
no ingress of dust; complete protection against contact

Second digit
Protection of the equipment inside the enclosure against harmful ingress of water.
Level Protected against Details
0 not protected —
1 dripping water
Dripping water (vertically falling drops) shall have no harmful effect.
2 dripping water when tilted up to 15°
Vertically dripping water shall have no harmful effect when the enclosure is tilted at an angle up to 15° from its normal position.
3 spraying water
Water falling as a spray at any angle up to 60° from the vertical shall have no harmful effect.
4 splashing water
Water splashing against the enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effect.
5 water jets
Water projected by a nozzle against enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effects.
6 heavy seas
Water from heavy seas or projected in powerful jets shall not enter the enclosure in harmful quantities.
7 immersion up to 1 m
Ingress of water in harmful quantity shall not be possible when the enclosure is immersed in water under defined conditions of pressure and time (up to 1 m of submersion).
8 immersion beyond 1 m
The equipment is suitable for continuous immersion in water under conditions which shall be specified by the manufacturer.
NOTE: Normally, this will mean that the equipment is hermetically sealed. However, with certain types of equipment, it can mean that water can enter but only in such a manner that produces no harmful effects.

Additional letters

The standard defines additional letters that can be appended to classify only the level of protection against access to hazardous parts by persons:
Level Protected against access to hazardous parts with
A back of hand
B finger
C tool
D wire

Further letters can be appended to provide additional information related to the protection of the device:
Letter Meaning
H high voltage device
M device moving during water test
S device standing still during water test
W weather conditions

Thanks Wikipedia.


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 8:35 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

If I remember correctly, most of our GPS units are IP67 - but I've certainly seen them fail the firehose (waterjet)


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 8:45 am
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
Topic starter
 

Thanks Jake. This looks like it would work. The thing I like about my 12 year old pump is that its built like a brick Sh!thouse --its never broken or malfunctioned on me.

It just doesn't have all the features that the new pumps have now.


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 9:23 am
(@briank)
Posts: 496
Chief Registered
 

IP67 is a pretty low standard, I think its essentially the product sitting in a bucket. It does not account for much spray.

I remember talking to Garmin once and their IP67 ratings do not cover spray. As a matter of fact, I was told my IP67 unit is not covered for direct rain which Garmin states can reach 60 mph. Garmin recommends the spray bag.

Im not too fimiliar with the IPX ratings, however Im not sure that a rating of

8

means you also get the protection of

1

through

7

.

Use a spray bag.


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 11:14 am
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
Topic starter
 
Quote
Use a spray bag.

That would be ideal, however, getting a spray bag around a device that attaches to my abdomen might be a bit daunting.


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 11:38 am
(@stank)
Posts: 5061
One Star Admiral Registered
 

So a drysuit wouldn't qualify? Sort of a big spray bag, isn't it?

I gotta hand it to your determination...


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 12:16 pm
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
Topic starter
 

drysuit is indeed a solution, except in the middle of the summer. The drysuit would cause excess sweat, and then the patch adhesive would separate prematurely.


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 12:34 pm
(@Anonymous 37989)
Posts: 729
 

Tad, You are a pioneer! I don't trust those ratings. You may remember Gary and Bill and their VHF tests. Them I trust! I had a nasty cut on my foot a few years back, and got some

waterproof bandages

at the pharmacy. They held up through some wild sailing out on the wire for about 4 hrs. The cut opened up after some running on the beach to rescue a friend, but I think the bandages were still intact. If the pump is small enough, perhaps you could contact the bandage manufacturer, and get some that would cover it.Keep us posted. I'm sure your experience will provide a lot of valuable info for others in your predicament. PS: Let me know when you want to claim that beer I owe you. Maybe we can get Chris to join us. <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 1:23 pm
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
Topic starter
 

during the tybee I used two infusion sites, both covered with tega-derm (think of shrink wrap for your skin) and didn't have any problems.

There are ways of keeping it dry but I've found that water will go where it wants, and the body can build up moisture from the inside if trapped.

As for that beer, I severed relations with my client in Waltham due to them being an unprofitable venture. So I don't know when I'll make a return to the area unfortunately <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : March 20, 2007 3:49 pm
Nick
 Nick
(@hobienick10)
Posts: 306
Mate Registered
 

I have a friend who works at Insulet. Contact me offline and I will get you his email. BTW, they claim you can wear them while swimming. I would be more concerned that it would fall off before it would allow water in.

hobienick at gmail dot com


 
Posted : March 22, 2007 12:06 pm
Secret Link