Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

Performance Catamarans pricing... out of control!

104 Posts
30 Users
0 Reactions
94.7 K Views
(@davea)
Posts: 809
Chief Registered
 

Guys the price of an A in NA is around $20k, and with a N20 being around the same cost where is the better value? I don't think that opening up the sails to 3rd party sailmakers is going to net you anything more than maybe a few hundred dollars savings, and then you will have open the door for a whole bunch of controversy..who is legal, who is going to measure them etc. No I don't think that SMOD is the poorest value for the money. PC has always been reasonable with their prices, and less cost than most but I do agree that the recent price increases are a bit steep. There are solutions to the $11k mast price, it is just a question of time/money to get those solutions to the fleets.

The cost of boats is a direct result of volume, inflation and yes profit margin. You can't compare the price of boats 30 years ago with today since the volume of boats made is a lot less and so the profit margin per boat has to be higher.

Even if somehow magically the cost of a N20 mast came down by $3000 or the cost of a new N20 came down $3000 do you think that more people would jump into the fleet? No I don't think so. But if the price goes up a lot more, say into Tornado territory then yes it will have an impact. I am sure that more people would be sailing Tornados if it weren't for the price.

I don't think that there really is a debate here about the N20 fleets. It is the only game in town for a 20' boat (at a reasonable cost) and it is a fantastic boat so there is (I think) no reason to speculate on its demise. I think the biggest risk is that PC stops building the boat due to no sales volume, and going to 3rd parties to get parts isn't going to look favourably for PC to continue building it. (Just to be clear I don't think there is any reason PC WOULD stop building the boat!) I do think that we need to support PC and not nickel and dime them as cat sailors are apt to do.


 
Posted : October 22, 2008 8:25 am
(@stank)
Posts: 5061
One Star Admiral Registered
 

so the original question was about the price of a mast. Aside from some anecdotal evidence on Tornado/Aclass mast prices, would any domestic manufacturer have an idea of a REALISTIC price for the mast if they were given the specs? Is it really low demand that is sparking the high cost?

Which costs more: changing the sailplan configuration to use a more readily available (and therefore cheaper)spar (like Tornado carbon masts), or paying more for spars that meet current configurations?

N20 owners: would you rather re-fit your boat to a new configuration ($5000 Tornado mast, $2000 main, $700 jib, $1200 spin) or suffer $11k if you break your current mast? (Insurance coverage issues aside)

I'm sure PC has solicited other mfg. companies for pricing on things like spars, rigging, and fit-out. Why, then, have companies not produced estimates lower than the rumored $11k spar?

And yes, I'd agree that beachcat sailors (and maybe flying dutchman class) are the cheapest sailors around. I was rail meat on a Tartan 31 that was a 2knot s-box, at best placing near the back of the pack (phrf) and the owner ponied up over $150 per race just to show up. Never mind sheltering 4 crew two weekends a month, buying 135% genoa, paynig yacht club dues, etc...
He actively raced for about 8 years until he couldn't find crew (all moved to faster boats). True Corinthian, out there to sail better even if he didn't win. And I wish there were more out there like him


 
Posted : October 22, 2008 8:45 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 

You can buy a 29' (or close to it) A-cat mast carbon tube from Hall Spars for $2,245.00 uncoated. $2780 clearcoated. No hardware.

Granted, it doesn't have nearly enough carbon for a Nacra 20 and this does not include hardware...but it's still a far cry from $11,000.


 
Posted : October 22, 2008 11:49 am
(@wlrottge)
Posts: 835
Chief Registered
 

Jake, you obviously don't get it! those stainless fittings are actullay gold coated with stainless! Didn't you know that?

Here, walk over behind this tree, I have some Kool Aid I need you to drink... it will all be ok soon <img src="<>/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" />

(sorry, reading too much political stuff... got carried away, lol)


 
Posted : October 22, 2008 12:30 pm
(@sundance1933)
Posts: 912
Member
 
Originally Posted by Jake

Granted, it doesn't have nearly enough carbon for a Nacra 20 and this does not include hardware...but it's still a far cry from $11,000.

I just got off the phone with a friend who has a company in Irvine California that builds carbon components for Boeing as well as racecar teams. I asked about carbon prices in general and he said that raw carbon material as gone from $20 to over $50 per pound recently.

He also said that the Navy has stockpiled millions of pounds for new projects including two mostly carbon destroyers. He wouldn’t say but my impression is that these two “tin cans” have already been built, each using a million pounds of carbon materials.

Where do carbon masts fall in this scheme of things?


 
Posted : October 22, 2008 6:52 pm
(@Anonymous 13274)
Posts: 3111
 

Make masts, not war.


 
Posted : October 22, 2008 7:10 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

Yea but can those destroyers fly a hull in 15 knots?


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 8:09 am
(@sundance1933)
Posts: 912
Member
 
Originally Posted by andrewscott
Yea but can those destroyers fly a hull in 15 knots?

Probably not but reports are that they can go 60 even though the specs say 30+.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/dd-x-pics.htm


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 8:45 am
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

If you can't fly a hull... i dont want to be on it (and i am x-navy) <img src="<>/smile.gif" alt="smile" title="smile" height="15" width="15" />


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 11:05 am
(@don_atchley)
Posts: 327
Mate Registered
 
Originally Posted by andrewscott
If you can't fly a hull... i dont want to be on it (and i am x-navy) <img src="<>/smile.gif" alt="smile" title="smile" height="15" width="15" />

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/08/02/military/8105195320.txt

Here you go. The second best branch of the U.S. Military is on board with multihulls...


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 3:24 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
 

I doubt that will fly a hull

[Linked Image]

Second best?


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 3:45 pm
(@erice)
Posts: 1419
Member
 

first you fly the akas

then you fly the main hull

then you tune up the volume

and fly with the rudder

http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=YSYmSnpQ360


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 4:54 pm
(@Anonymous 13274)
Posts: 3111
 

Oh crap...


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 5:29 pm
(@dacarlso)
Posts: 723
Chief Registered
 

High prices and low volumes always come together with a dieing fleet.... European arms races seem to be less damaging to the fleets than American over-control from my view.
WOW, Mayfield has this dialed in: I fail to see how Performance Cat is still in business....


 
Posted : October 23, 2008 9:54 pm
Page 4 / 4
Secret Link