Sails, Wings, and Winglets

Who hasnt noticed that most new airplanes out there today have 'winglets' attaced to the end of the wings? Some older planes are even being equipped with blended winglet technology. The result is less drag, more effiecient airflow,= less fuel burn.
If we subcribe that a sail is a wing, why not put winglets on top of the mast (some winglets extend both directions, up and down such as the A330). Would you not get the same result? Less Drag, more streamlined airflow?
Has this been tried, attempted, or is it nonsence?
Michael
At the speeds sailboats are operating, I think the drag of the winglet would be far larger then the pressure leak it eventually might stop. The added weight that far up would not do much good for pitching and sideways stability either.
Also, sails and wings are not directly comparable. AoA for a sail is at best 25-30degrees whereas a wing has an Aoa of about 1 degree. The aspect ratio is also way off. All due to the constraints of the different environments the two crafts operate in.
Just my opinion..
Michael,
If memory serves me correctly, Dennis Connor's Americas Cup catamaran "Stars and Stripes" (1988 challenge) had a hard wing sail with winglet "tips" at the top of the mastwing. The mastwing was built and tested by Burt Rutan's company, Scaled Composites in Mojave, CA. The mast tips were added to reduce vortex drag after wind tunnel testing.
I'm not sure if the savings in drag from the winglets will be all that advantageous when considering all of the other things on the boat that cause drag. You have all of the standing rigging, the trap wires, some of the running rigging, spin poles and socks (on some boats), the crew, and harware placed on the mast that will interrupt the airfoil shape... Basically and non-streamlined object on the boat.
Unless the "mastlets" give you a substantial increase in lift they really are not worth the expense. I believe the winglets on the airlines do not increase lift, but just reduce drag (and save about 10% in fuel consumption each flight) by reducing the draga for vortex generation as mentioned earlier.
I may be wrong, but I also don't remember seeing winglets on non-swept wing aircraft. This could be due to the fact that most swept wing aircraft are high speed, heavy aircraft who would benefit from the drag reduction.
"Winglets" were tried years ago on A class cats. The principle is sound and the reduction in drag due to the reduction in "tip vortex" is very measurable, the problem with a rotating mast is that to have the winglet as part of the mast, when it is rotated in relation to the sail the "plate" that forms the winglet has to be very large to still offer its effects to the sail on both tacks, the head of the sail has to be "squared" off and attached to the winglet plate by something similar to a "radial traveller" so that sail and the winglet form as near as possible a "one piece" tip. An offshoot of this unsuccessful "experiment" with winglets on masts that is being adopted more and more today was the early application of the square head sail. The same problems are not an issue on aircraft wings as both components are a “fixed” one part. The "Americas Cup" "J" class boats used the same principle at the bottom of the sail when they reduced (to advantage) the "vortex" or "equalisation of pressure" around the foot of their mainsail by using the "Park avenue" boom.

Shame it was not the same shape or even anything like the boat that was challenged in.
Wasnt that the point? Connor & co did not know anything about the boat the kiwis already had buildt in secret, before they challenged, except the length and width (and boy, was the kiwi boat wide!). The kiwis was obviously thinking "outside the box", and to catch up they needed something really spectacular. There was no requirement for a monohull in the challenge, so they looked at the fastest sailing vessels on the planet, foilers, planing skiffs, trimarans etc., but landed on a C-class on steroids as their best option. They did pretty good under the circumstanses, I would say.
Now, I dont think SS had a proper winglet. I would say they had a tapered top on their wing to reduce tip vortex. I understood winglets to be 90degrees or so to the foil, and their primary function to reduce pressure leakage? Secondary, reduce tip vortices?
There were two of them - The first (a soft sailed version) was once owned by Steve Fossett and I believe is still active in the Great Lakes region in the US (Chicago, IL I believe). I think it was up for sale recently. The second went to a rich guy in Mexico who ran into some financial or legal trouble. The boat sat moored in the water for years (with the solid wing rigged). I saw a picture of it about a year ago where several of the wing panels were missing and boat was very neglected and a terrible state of disrepair. Apparently it came up for sale but I don't think anyone took it home.
There was a video posted somewhere of the soft sail SS blasting trough a fleet of monohulls. It was made by the new crew/owner, so it's definately sailing. I see that there is a copy on thebeachcats.com..
http://www.thebeachcats.com/modules...

http://www.thebeachcats.com/modules...
Linky no worky
I was in Auckland just after Conner lost the Cup to the Kiwis. I was walking around the port area and saw both Black Magic and the humungous challenger on the hard. The failed challenge boat made Black Magic look like a Sabot.
They were both close to the YC where the Cup was kept. I looked in the front door and it was sitting in a case just inside. That didn't last long because some nutter took a hammer to it.
When I was looking for the pic I read something about it being in Key West availible for charter. I didn't pay attention to date so that may have been a while ago. That would be the soft sail version.
1. Perhaps a mast-top winglet system would actually work in wave-piercing cats like A-class cats: Since pitching is not helpful to this concept, the wave-piercers seem to do it less.
2. Has anyone actually tried measuring pitching in wave piercers vs lets say- Marstrom conventional hull shapes?
This could be done from a digital video tape or a CD: at 1 second intervals, measure angle of mast rake for each boat. They should be sailing parallel to another to weather in appreciable waves for several minutes.
Put data on Excel sheet, (or by some magic maths which I do not possess)---determine which pitches less, and how much less!
- 57 Forums
- 31.6 K Topics
- 345.9 K Posts
- 2,909 Online
- 31.1 K Members
