Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

Why don't we use bigger kites?

13 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
5,837 Views
pdwarren
(@pdwarren)
Posts: 462
Chief Registered
Topic starter
 
[#19250]

Just been watching some of the 18' skiff footage on http://www.sailcam.tv/video_flash.php?vid=188 and it's left me wondering why we don't use bigger kite cats?

In the half-boat world, mast-top kites are common place, but seemingly not for cats. Obviously you'd have to come up with a way of keeping the mast in one piece, but the monos seem to manage it.

My first response is that the kite on the F18s/F16s I've sailed is quite big enough, thank you. But wouldn't a bigger sail just allow you to go deeper at the same speed?

Paul


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 5:01 am
(@Anonymous 6548)
Posts: 1652
 

Extra Drag....

Monos are not that efficient and rely on brute force to get them up to speed, where as cats are more refined and rely on lower drag rigs.


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 5:52 am
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
Just been watching some of the 18' skiff footage on http://www.sailcam.tv/video_flash.php?vid=188 and it's left me wondering why we don't use bigger kite cats?

In the half-boat world, mast-top kites are common place, but seemingly not for cats. Obviously you'd have to come up with a way of keeping the mast in one piece, but the monos seem to manage it.

My first response is that the kite on the F18s/F16s I've sailed is quite big enough, thank you. But wouldn't a bigger sail just allow you to go deeper at the same speed?

Paul

Some of the big ARC cats do have masthead kites but also have baby stays that run from the mast tip to the ends of the rear beam. If you remember back to the early days of catamaran spinnakers, they were big and full and have been evolving rather quickly into the flat and smaller shapes that we have now. I wouldn't be opposed to seeing some sort of masthead rig come out for development, but I think we might find that our existing setup is pretty optimized.

I believe the answer will lie in the same reason we don't run masthead genoa's upwind (except for a few who do so in very light conditions).


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 8:06 am
(@Anonymous 38725)
Posts: 5859
 

I'm guessing it has to do with apparent wind direction? Allthough the 18' skiffs are very fast, I don't know what their angles are. I know that even when we go downwind fast on a Cat, our apparent wind is well forward in a good blow, not light air. Rick has made the case for hooters instead of spins for cats and the Volvo 40's are also using hooters instead of spins. I don't know why we don't see those on the 18' skiffs though.


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 12:06 pm
(@cbarmonde)
Posts: 160
Member
 

The wide platform of a cat allows for an open

slot

between the genneher and the mainsail. This accelerates the wind over the back of the mainsail and creates more lift. A mono simply is not wide enough to properly lead a headsail in order to achieve this effect.

Some cats even have articulating spin poles that optimise this effect.

Also, I have a masthead spin for my stiletto 23. It is total overkill and does not work s well as a flat modern asym. The VX40 guys have it nailed I think.


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 12:17 pm
MaryAWells
(@maryawells)
Posts: 5485
Member
 

You mean a hooter-type, roller-furling headsail?


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 12:21 pm
pdwarren
(@pdwarren)
Posts: 462
Chief Registered
Topic starter
 
Quote
The wide platform of a cat allows for an open

slot

between the genneher and the mainsail. This accelerates the wind over the back of the mainsail and creates more lift. A mono simply is not wide enough to properly lead a headsail in order to achieve this effect.

18' skiff is wider than your average cat, if I remember right. Not sure whether they're allowed to sheet to the racks, though.

Paul


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 12:47 pm
pdwarren
(@pdwarren)
Posts: 462
Chief Registered
Topic starter
 
Quote
I'm guessing it has to do with apparent wind direction? Allthough the 18' skiffs are very fast, I don't know what their angles are.

I think they're not too different from asymmetric cats. Certainly the apparent wind is going to be well forward at those speeds.

Quote
Rick has made the case for hooters instead of spins for cats and the Volvo 40's are also using hooters instead of spins. I don't know why we don't see those on the 18' skiffs though.

What's the different between a hooter and an asymmetric spin? Is a hooter just flatter, or is there more to it than that?

Paul


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 12:51 pm
Jake Kohl
(@jake)
Posts: 11744
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
The wide platform of a cat allows for an open

slot

between the genneher and the mainsail. This accelerates the wind over the back of the mainsail and creates more lift. A mono simply is not wide enough to properly lead a headsail in order to achieve this effect.

If this was true, certainly they would come up with poles to move their sheeting points further out (like a jib pole on a monoslug). In my opinion, I think it's more relative to the balance point between available righting moment, overall weight, and sail area to make the best VMG downwind. Cats have a lot of righting moment and can handle hot angles downwind. As such, our sails are optimized for these hot angles. Skiffs have a little less righting leverage so they run fuller bigger kites.


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 1:43 pm
(@Anonymous 13024)
Posts: 4319
 

I think Jake has it covered. In addition, our platforms are easier to control than an 18foot skiff (at least it looks that way from the videos I have seen).
Besides, haven't we agreed that tornados are faster than the 18footers <img src=

alt=

/>


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 1:47 pm
scooby_simon
(@simonJlongstaff)
Posts: 3496
Captain Registered
 
Quote
Besides, haven't we agreed that tornados are faster than the 18footers <img src=

alt=

/>

yes !


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 3:10 pm
(@wlrottge)
Posts: 835
Chief Registered
 
Quote
The wide platform of a cat allows for an open

slot

between the genneher and the mainsail. This accelerates the wind over the back of the mainsail and creates more lift.

Not true, it's been shown that head sails actually do NOT increase the WS in the slot, they actually decrease it. What they do however, is keep the flow attached to the lee side of the main longer/more consistently which improves it's efficiency and therefore it's performance.


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 10:08 pm
(@cbarmonde)
Posts: 160
Member
 

Interesting, would it be fair to say that the wider the

slot

, the less it slows down the WS while still keeping the flow attached to the lee of the main?


 
Posted : January 22, 2007 10:29 pm
Secret Link