Welcome Guest
Catamaran Sailing at TheBeachcats.com Logo
Notifications
Clear all

racing with both monohulls and multihulls

87 Posts
24 Users
0 Reactions
35.8 K Views
(@wouter)
Posts: 9363
Three Star Admiral Registered
 
Quote
Er.... No, actually the computer (and the internet) were British inventions.....

I seem to recall that the code breaker machine that was first used at Bletchly park, and that would soon lead to the electronic computers of the early years, was actually a Polish design. Alan Turing (UK) was the first to use electronic tubes as switches in the design, significantly improving its processing speed. The yanks took the technology with them statewise in the final stages of the war. The first real PC chipset, the 8086 and 8088 series, were actually spin-offs of the NASA moonlanding projects. And we all know how many ex-nazi's and other non-US trained engineers worked on that.

The Internet itself, or rather the hardware network structure that acts as infrastructure orginates with the US Defense ARPA network I beleive. A US build grid that was to be used by the defensive forces or guerilla's during an sovjet occupation. The software part of it, HTML etc, was actually thought up by European engineers at the CERN partical research institute in Zwisterland. The porno that made the net great in the beginning came from all sides.

Netscape/mosaic was/is US based. Cheap computers and parts that allow its rapid introduction into households came (and still come) from Asian nations. I'm using a flat screen monitor right now (Japanese patent), before I used a electron tube monitor (european patent, many of which are Philips patents = Dutch). The bloody thing uses electricity (European invention), halve of its used plastics are patented by DOW chemical, the other halve by various European and Asian companies like the Dutch DSM company. The Lithography machines used to make the chips are most likely made by ASML Lithography (Dutch company). I think they have 85 % of the world market in that area.

The English language I use for communication is a European invention. Language as general invention is an African invention. Written language is an Asia minor invention (mesoptemia). Who actually invented the Binairy number system. The general invention of numbers and its aritmatic is actually an Arabian invention. Mathematics, or rather its ald name "Algebra", is derived from the Arabic scholar Al-Jabr (present day Iraq). He was the first to write a text book on Algebraic concepts and started the whole field of present day Algebra (mathematics). Of course he used various sources of older mathematical discoveries. Many of them Greek, Arabic and Sanskrit (india) origin.

Yes, I would say that this was pretty much a global effort. But leave it to the Yanks to claim all the credit for it.

They also think that they invented the Applepie, pizza, TV and automobiel.

Wouter


 
Posted : February 14, 2006 6:42 pm
SunnyZ
(@wlannon)
Posts: 154
Mate Registered
 

I have been reading posts anonymously for a month or so. I am trying to learn. And I have learned a lot from the posts of all of you who know so much about things I know so little about. I have been impressed that sailors from all over the world could comment and offer help to each other. All of you have the same passion and interest. Please gentlemen, you are really disappointing me. You are not at all different. Nearly everyone in the states is of European decent. If you ask an American about his heritage they will say my family is Scottish, or Norwegian, or Irish. This is a silly thread that is below any of you. I have been hanging on your words for weeks. I have the utmost respect for you and your knowledge of this sport, no matter what country governs you. Enough of this.


 
Posted : February 14, 2006 7:27 pm
(@Anonymous 39155)
Posts: 3112
 
Quote
I This is a silly thread that is below any of you.

Hi Sunny; Couldn't disagree with you more, this is the most entertaing thing I've done lately, 'couse I don't get out much!

However, this does seem to be upsetting a lot of people, so let's move the fray to more suitable ground. Remeber, poor ol' Matt just wanted to know how to join up with the monohull folks!

How 'bout it Wouter? I challenge you! Let's start a new thread and see who can come up with must satiric name!?

Sunny, don't worry, I don't have any personal nukes and I'm well out of range of Wouters' blunderbuss!


 
Posted : February 14, 2006 9:10 pm
hobie1616
(@hobie1616)
Posts: 2117
Captain Registered
 
Quote
Er.... No, actually the computer (and the internet) were British inventions.....

When did SRI move? Was DARPA founded in the UK?


 
Posted : February 14, 2006 9:46 pm
(@Anonymous 12680)
Posts: 1113
 

DO NOT READ THIS POST UNTIL AFTER 22:00 hours local time and 6 drinks....it is for entertainment purposes only.

Quote
...during the 80 year (rebellion) war with Spain. The three Dutch-English wars during the 17th century, or even the fight with the murderous HORDES from the east. From The Huns (right after birth of christ) to the Mongols somewhere around the first millenium. Not forgetting the Vandals, the Vicogoths or even the Viking invasions. As well as the various clashes of the 19th century. Come to think of it the Romain empire itself came to a end in the Dutch marshes and the German Forrests.

Sounds like the Dutch have relationship issues. Maybe Dr. Phil could help....wait, he is American, is that allowed?

Quote
Ehh, wait a minute, the americans of those time were still wearing bear skins and feathers and dancing around a bon-fire.

Ouch. This statement will make the cartoon protests seem miniscule.

Quote
.... the financier of the American revolution itself and have sheltered the very pilgrim fathers from prosecution before they decided to sail to the new world. Haven't seen much thanks for those contributions lately.

Thanks for the financing, it came in handy. Has that tab been cleared or did we default on it? By the way, why'd they leave? Sounds perfect to me.

Quote
If you think that a more permanent Nazi or Sovjet occupation would have ended our claim to these lands or killed off our identity then you are seriously mistaken. In time, we would have again fought ourselfs free and would have re-established control of our own destiny as we had done 10's of times in the past 2 millenia of Dutch history.

Time would have told, gladly it was avoided. Most occupations you mentioned crumbled from within due to lack of oversight, lack of speedy communication, lack of speedy travel - which while not perfected were coming of age in the 1940's. It is an interesting philosophical question how long an occupation would have lasted in these more current times - assuming the Nazi's would have kept up their extrodinary economic development that they saw in the 1930's.

Quote
Thanks goes TO YOUR FATHER OR GRANDFATHER for putting in a contribution that rather soon shedded our yoke in 1945; I write contribution as I seem to remember large formations of Poles; Canadians, Brits, Free Dutch, Free French and what not else in this endeavour.

All TOUGH SOBs, in my book.

Quote
But don't ever make the mistake of thinking that YOU personally can derive any credit from this. You didn't do any fighting. And don't think that your larger American family singlehandedly achieved something that wasn't coming our way in due time anyway. And your weren't defending any European liberties in Korea, Vietnam, Grenada or even Iraq (I refrain from giving you the full listing)

This response was a little personal and "is exactly why it is always so easy to sting them with such remarks".

Quote
...during that time many sacrifices have been made in favour of the survival of a nation. In this light it will be wise to remember the modesty of your contributions and the travesty of your own failings.

Very elegant. I cannot remember the book I read that in, but I am still looking for the title.

All in all, a very concise look at how differently historical contributions can be viewed - dependent upon ones local surroundings.

We all have Al Gore and his wonderful internet to thank for making it all possible.

While you have your list of inventors out: who invented fiberglass, carbon fiber techniques and all the other cool sailing related inventions?


 
Posted : February 14, 2006 10:37 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
Topic starter
 

Guys:

ENOUGH!!!!!

Lets stop the war and remember
why we are all here

This is suppose to be about Catamarans and Sailing not useless babel

Bring on the Summer and the good Wind. Flying a hull and good racing.

Doug Snell
Hobie 17
Soon to be Nacra A2
www.tcdyc.com


 
Posted : February 14, 2006 11:43 pm
 Trey
(@NCSUtrey)
Posts: 813
Chief Registered
 

Yeah, end it here. No more political BS.

Racing with the mono's is quite fun. I find it very interesting to see how the cat performs compared to other boats, especially ones that are exceptional pointers (thistle/etc). Not only does it give me the chance to a) see some other cool boats with skippers that are just as enthusiastic about their "yacht," but it b) allows them to see the way a cat behaves on the water. It is my chance to distinguish us from other boats, and to disspell any myths that cats may still retain. At any rate, sailing, be it on a mono, dinghy, or cat, is a plus. In these times when sailing seems to be declining, I'll take what I can! Arrrgghhh!


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 12:38 am
MaryAWells
(@maryawells)
Posts: 5485
Member
 
Quote
The problem with our situation is that we have permanently set racing marks out a couple of miles and just set the start to the wind. This means that making a separate course would not be that easy.

Matt,
I am curious -- at our club on Lake Erie we had permanent marks set out in a big circle so they basically covered all possible wind directions, and then the race committee boat set up in the middle of the circle and chose the course marks and set the starting line based upon the wind direction.

Is that what you have? If not, what exactly do you have in terms of permanent marks?


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 1:34 am
 grob
(@grob)
Posts: 541
Chief Registered
 
Quote
This is suppose to be about Catamarans

The modern catamaran was invented by Sir William Petty an englishman

Gareth


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 3:40 am
(@mauganh17)
Posts: 3089
Captain Registered
 
Quote
I'll bet maugan has either just fainted or is blowing steam from his ears, right now.

Nope. I just know when my comments are not wanted any further.

A skill that unfortunately, you have yet to master my socialist friend.


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 9:34 am
(@Anonymous 39155)
Posts: 3112
 

Maughan17/Wouter:

I'll be happy to joust with both you guys at "political science" (new thread).


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 9:49 am
bvining
(@bvining)
Posts: 1208
Member
 
Quote
Nope. I just know when my comments are not wanted any further.

A skill that unfortunately, you have yet to master my socialist friend.

Now that was funny


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 11:22 am
(@kbcatman)
Posts: 1444
Master Chief Registered
 
Quote
Quote
This is suppose to be about Catamarans

The modern catamaran was invented by Sir William Petty an englishman

Gareth

I always thought of him with respect to bigger ships, but I see he did the smaller and funner stuff too. I always thought of Herreshoff with Amaryllis being more in line with modern cats...

Cat Kicking Mono Butt in the 1870's


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 2:55 pm
(@Anonymous 39123)
Posts: 183
 

The modern catamaran was invented 3000 years ago by the Polynesians. Do the research. The hull tech isn't that different, only the materials have changed.

Suggest "We the Navigators" David Lewis


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 4:18 pm
(@Anonymous 39155)
Posts: 3112
 

Also, see "Canoes of Oceania", Haddon & Hornell; or just go here: http://www.wharram.com/


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 4:27 pm
(@kbcatman)
Posts: 1444
Master Chief Registered
 
Quote
The modern catamaran was invented 3000 years ago by the Polynesians. Do the research. The hull tech isn't that different, only the materials have changed.

Suggest "We the Navigators" David Lewis

Gosh, I had no idea about what the Polynesians did.

I'm always up for a good read, but who doesn't know the Polynesian side. No doubt the inspiration for what we sail these days. Familiar with Wharram and the like (although I have never owned or sailed one like you guys).

I was thinking modern in the sense of appearing in the midst of what everybody else thinks/thought is modern, or the crossover that more resembles what we sail today. For instance the attempt to build a catamaran warship by Sir William Petty or Herreshoff adding the gaff and sprit rig and taking on the yachts of the time in what sounds like modern beach cat fashion. Many years later we consider a sprit/pole to almost be a required part of modern cat design. True that depending on what you sail the difference may be less rather than more. Didn't mean to offend Polynesian sensibilities.

Where would one draw the line between modern and not? Would a 3000 year old Polynesian design be considered modern next to a Reynolds 33 or a maxi cat from the The Race? Or an A-Cat for that matter. Sure the concept and basic design are there, and people tend to learn from them by looking back (using lashings for hull to crossbeam connections as an example - Wharram, CLC MBuli, others). I'll go out on a limb and say there's more difference than simply building a Polynesian design from carbon fiber. Is a Wharram modern next to a Gunboat? Is the difference only materials? Interesting questions.

Anyway, I think the Amaryllis story is interesting on this thread if for no other reason than the original thread is about multis and monos racing together. I have always regarded that as the beginning of the modern multi/mono "feud", at least in the US.


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 5:55 pm
(@Anonymous 39123)
Posts: 183
 

You say:
who doesn't know the Polynesian side.
---based on remarks like the below, I don't think YOU do. Sorry if this offends your Eurocentric sensibilities...

You said: For instance the attempt to build a catamaran warship by Sir William Petty or Herreshoff adding the gaff and sprit rig and taking on the yachts of the time in what sounds like modern beach cat fashion. Many years later we consider a sprit/pole to almost be a required part of modern cat design.

----go here: http://www.pvs-hawaii.com/canoe/canoe_evolution.htm

---A crabclaw IS a sprit rig. Both the Polynesians AND the Arabs (catsail, JUST like the Sunfish rig-look at a felucca) were sailing upwind for thousands of years before the Europeans happened to stumble upon it.

The basic, long, narrow, V-hull design is pretty old. In fact, neither Amaryllis (flat bottomed) nor Petty's design is as 'modern' as the Polynesian cats. They used the shipbuilding techniques that we now consider 'old' (frame-and-plank) whereat the actually OLD Polynesian techniques are more like what's being done now (stitch-and-glue, tortured ply, bulkheaded). The materials are now different, sure, but the basic hull concepts from the Polynesians are now just pretty much refined. I have this info from reading what the designers (Wharram, Shuttleworth, etc.) have to say. They looked to the Polynesians for first principles.

Here's another tidbit: Battened sails were invented by the Chinese - have a look at junk-type sails sometime. Works the same... the Chinese have a saying about how the sail is 'an ear listening for the wind.'

Again, sorry to offend your Eurocentric sensibilities, but credit is due where it's due, and these designers just refined the concept-they didn't invent it. But then, there's nothing new under the sun.


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 7:12 pm
MaryAWells
(@maryawells)
Posts: 5485
Member
 

Hmmm, I'm confused. What do you mean by "eurocentric sensibilities" when you are talking to somebody from Annapolis, Maryland?


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 7:18 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
Topic starter
 

Tami:

You go girl. Put them in there place.
Will I see you at deep South?

Doug


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 7:20 pm
(@Anonymous 39123)
Posts: 183
 

I'm not Polynesian, yet you don't ask this question of Mr Keith who initiated the 'sensibilities' remarks.

Nor am I but half European, the other half being Cherokee, straight outta the Quallah tribe. Being that most of the US is of European descent, as certainly was Petty and very likely Herreshoff, the term applies.

Nevertheless, Eurocentric is a term used as opposed to, shall we say, colonial, or dare I say primitive? The concept that a 'developed country' must have invented this 'modern' technology would be termed 'Eurocentric.'


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 7:32 pm
(@_removed-account)
Posts: 15030
Four Star Admiral Registered
Topic starter
 

Tami:

Like you said unless you are pure Native American we are ALL foreigners when Columbus stepped off the boat

Doug


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 7:43 pm
MaryAWells
(@maryawells)
Posts: 5485
Member
 

Heck, you have lost me, because I'm still trying to figure out what "sensibilities" means.


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 7:44 pm
(@Anonymous 39155)
Posts: 3112
 

I watch way too much Discovery channel. Some genetics guru says we're all related to some guy in East Africa from 60,000 years ago.

My father always said I looked strange, now I know why!


 
Posted : February 15, 2006 8:04 pm
(@Anonymous 512)
Posts: 125
 

Hey Boudicca did someone pee in your wheaties this morning. You seem awfully angry over the remarks about what makes a modern design or not. I don't believe Keith ever said anything about the Polynesian design being primitive, that's something that you read into it.

Why are some of you guys taking this stuff so personally? Aren't there more important things in your lives to get worked up about?

Alec


 
Posted : February 16, 2006 9:20 am
(@kbcatman)
Posts: 1444
Master Chief Registered
 
Quote
You say:
who doesn't know the Polynesian side.
---based on remarks like the below, I don't think YOU do. Sorry if this offends your Eurocentric sensibilities...

You said: For instance the attempt to build a catamaran warship by Sir William Petty or Herreshoff adding the gaff and sprit rig and taking on the yachts of the time in what sounds like modern beach cat fashion. Many years later we consider a sprit/pole to almost be a required part of modern cat design.

----go here: http://www.pvs-hawaii.com/canoe/canoe_evolution.htm

---A crabclaw IS a sprit rig. Both the Polynesians AND the Arabs (catsail, JUST like the Sunfish rig-look at a felucca) were sailing upwind for thousands of years before the Europeans happened to stumble upon it.

The basic, long, narrow, V-hull design is pretty old. In fact, neither Amaryllis (flat bottomed) nor Petty's design is as 'modern' as the Polynesian cats. They used the shipbuilding techniques that we now consider 'old' (frame-and-plank) whereat the actually OLD Polynesian techniques are more like what's being done now (stitch-and-glue, tortured ply, bulkheaded). The materials are now different, sure, but the basic hull concepts from the Polynesians are now just pretty much refined. I have this info from reading what the designers (Wharram, Shuttleworth, etc.) have to say. They looked to the Polynesians for first principles.

Here's another tidbit: Battened sails were invented by the Chinese - have a look at junk-type sails sometime. Works the same... the Chinese have a saying about how the sail is 'an ear listening for the wind.'

Again, sorry to offend your Eurocentric sensibilities, but credit is due where it's due, and these designers just refined the concept-they didn't invent it. But then, there's nothing new under the sun.

What's your problem? Gotta have a fight? Want to lay frustration from previous crap in this thread on my head? Whatever.

By sprit I meant bowsprit. Yes, crabclaws, junks, lateens, etc. all came before. The use of sails themselves came before. The idea of something that can float came before from somewhere else. Doesn't mean that there are not modern versions.

My comment about Polynesian sensibilities was only because you seemed to believe that only you had knowledge of their contributions - the "do your research" line ticked me off. It was actually meant tongue in cheek. Sorry. Never said anything or claimed anything about battened sails, and if you knew me (which you don't) you'd realize that the eurocentric remark is pretty stupid. But yes, I must claim european as my ancestral roots. Because of that I must have never known that fully battened sails were not an invention of Hobie Alter - NOT. Chinese junks you say? Never heard of 'em. I'll have to look that up.

Yes, narrow v-bottomed hulls are pretty old. Do we all use them these days? No. Is that simply a refinement? Maybe. I-20s, and others use a flatter section. Your main hull (vaka) on your F-27 although narrow, is flatter on the bottom to promote planing by the main hull (even though the amas or as Farrier calls them floats are v-sectioned), and Ian likes to make that distinction with respect to other designs that follow the narrow v-shaped model, more room and faster he says. Looking to old designs for principles doesn't mean that new designs are merely copies, only influenced (although some are copies). Even Petty and Herreshoff admit to being influenced by the Polynesians. Good for them to draw on that to produce something out of the box from the conventional eurocentric thoughts and designs of their times, and to introduce the concepts to a lot of folks who though themselves to be the pinnacle.

But I still think that that the appearance of the boats from Herreshoff and Petty in the middle of what was considered at the time to be the cream of the crop of boat design as significant. Petty's larger stuff looks more like two conventional ships joined at the hip. But the boats Herreshoff was trying were a little more in line with what we have today. And Amaryllis was not his only one. And the mono/multi debate at that time is certainly a preview of modern times.

Since we're all googling, here's an interesting page. It's in French, and the English link brings up a translator (not an English version of the site). Look at the configuration of Amaryllis. I may be crazy, but it bears similarities to what is sailed today.

More Stuff

Anyway, have a nice day. Relax. Take a deep breath.


 
Posted : February 16, 2006 10:30 am
(@Anonymous 39123)
Posts: 183
 

What personal remarks were made? What could possibly incite you to anger? There was nothing in my remarks to infer such, and I stand by my assertions. Expression of a contrary point is debate, not aggression. If you express an opinion, expect another - that's how it goes.

Boys, if I get angry, trust me, you'll know it.


 
Posted : February 16, 2006 11:04 am
(@kbcatman)
Posts: 1444
Master Chief Registered
 
Quote
What personal remarks were made? What could possibly incite you to anger? There was nothing in my remarks to infer such, and I stand by my assertions. Expression of a contrary point is debate, not aggression. If you express an opinion, expect another - that's how it goes.

Boys, if I get angry, trust me, you'll know it.

I explained myself in the previous post and said sorry, and yes, my "sensibilities" comment was again tongue in cheek. I'll make sure to label all such things as such in the future. I didn't like your assumption on what I (or most people on this forum) don't know and what sounded to me like a very condescending way to reinforce that. And then you proceeded to attack based on more assumptions. Difference of opinions and disagreements are one thing and make things fun and interesting. It didn't sound that way to me. But in retrospect that was all probably tongue in cheek too, sorry I missed it. I'm not a particularly thin-skinned person. But I ain't a newbie either.

This thread, although in the beginning had a very interesting and noble purpose, seems to be possessed by some kind malicious spirit (an ancient Polynesian God? Joking, just joking). Seems to bring out the frothing, spitting worst in people. We need to perform an exorcism. Or just go sailing. The one winter blast is done here and we're back to our winter of 60 degree days.


 
Posted : February 16, 2006 11:23 am
Page 3 / 3
Secret Link