You keep it up with the escort guy you'll lose all your kitchen passes.
Thankfully, it's also my right to ignore any and all comments posted by anyone (except the asian escort guy...)
Grow the f*ck up people. Its a completely fair statement. Barry is just another black man living in Gov't housing. If Romney is elected would anybody get wound up if it someone said just another white boy living in Gov't housing? No, they wouldn't. Now, if it said Romney, just another cracker living in Gov't housing would they get wound up? Nope. It'd be dismissed rather quickly.
Don't worry Pete, Cap't Obama will be at the helm for another four years. Fortunately for him, this country is made up mostly of racist's who are in denial, and are constantly told, and under societal pressure that their views on race are wrong. You may disapprove, you may not like it, but there is no such thing as wrong. Furthermore, its going to be either Obama or Romney, whats the difference? One's a commie, the others a god damn socialist, and they're both worthless liars not worthy of the effort of putting them on a pike.
God damn it, I hate political correctness.
Sorry for the hijack. I just hate this guise of intolerance guised as tolerance bullsh*t. Its okay for you to hate someone because they don't like, or flat out hate another, but there's nothing wrong with the hater hating the other one.
http:/
In one case it can be inferred that the democratically elected president is hated simply because he is black. In the other case, a thinking person may dislike the person that appears to be proudly associating himself with race-based hatred specifically because that kind of thinking and actions based on that thinking (prominent 100 years ago) are ignorant and detrimental to everyone involved.
The two are not alike. Sometimes political correctness is simply correct. Condemming racism, not defending it, is the proper thing to do.
This site may soon find itself limited to like-minded Southern white boys telling Captain Noah jokes to themselves. Carry on, if that is what you want.
ROFLMAO! I couldn't have said it better.
This site may soon find itself limited to like-minded Southern white boys telling Captain Noah jokes to themselves. Carry on, if that is what you want.
Unfortunately I've come to believe you are quite correct and that is the inevitable outcome.
fwiw, I'm unconvinced it's okay to hate anyone or anything except in the most extreme cases.
http:/
Getting back on topic...
I like to abuse my spam with a 30-30! Anyone else?
I've got a 300 Win Mag I could bring to the party.
What's a Captain Noah joke?
So when did the president become Black? I thought he was half black and half white, isn't that tan, mocha, or mulatto?
He should only get half of the guilt ridden race vote if that's the case. Douchebags.
Tawd, prepare for a boot to the nuts next time we meet.
You better bring somebody else in those boots , cuz you ain't got the stones.
http:/
In one case it can be inferred that the democratically elected president is hated simply because he is black. In the other case, a thinking person may dislike the person that appears to be proudly associating himself with race-based hatred specifically because that kind of thinking and actions based on that thinking (prominent 100 years ago) are ignorant and detrimental to everyone involved.
The two are not alike. Sometimes political correctness is simply correct. Condemming racism, not defending it, is the proper thing to do.
This site may soon find itself limited to like-minded Southern white boys telling Captain Noah jokes to themselves. Carry on, if that is what you want.
So the Rev. Jeremiah Wrights racism is OK because it comes from a black man? Not exactly an equal playing field.
Here's a little tune about being stereotyped.
And before you start in on the Nazi skinhead thing do a little research on Ian McKay and Minor threat.
Wow, what happened here?
Capt'n Noah? Mikee, ever read Ricks Magazine?
Capt'n Noah? Mikee, ever read Ricks Magazine?
Do you mean more than one Rick as in
Ricks
or or did you mean the possessive
Rick's
as in, the magazine is his or
Rick's Magazine?
I haven't read Rick's magazine.
http:/
http:/
You know so long as (the late)Lee Atwater, Karl Rove, Roger Ailes, Grover Norquist, and Rupert Murdoch have convinced you that Obama is not for you, their work is done. All the rest of the propaganda is just a means to that end. You don't have to swallow the entire pitcher of Kool Aid. I have trouble understanding how Jeremiah Wright is a threat to us. The Koch brothers want their politicians to protect their wealth, that I can understand. Maybe they sail beach cats too. But somehow I suspect what is good for the superwealthy is not actually good for the rest of us. Trumped up concern about black on white racism, gun control, or where Obama was born, is just a useful tool for them.
I apologize for not watching the suggested video or doing the suggested research. I endeavor to avoid being a tool for the goals of Karl Rove, et al.
Really? You guys should move this to the train wreck thread.
Why's that Lonestarcat? It's those evil super wealthy that do all the innovative things, its those nasty super wealthy that supply the rest of us jobs, its those horrid super wealthy that drive the economy.
Wow! From simple (percieved) racism to the super wealthy in one page! AWESOME! Libs are an impressive bunch indeed.
Why's that Lonestarcat? It's those evil super wealthy that do all the innovative things, its those nasty super wealthy that supply the rest of us jobs, its those horrid super wealthy that drive the economy.
That's just not true. Consider Gates and Jobs, neither was wealthy when they started out. Iirc, IBM came to Gates for help with their pc and they still couldn't build a competitve system.
How many Uber clients do you build cabinets for?
Oh dear, another delusional liberal who thinks that the Koch brothers are born from the bounty of the devil's loins, however Soros and his tentacles consist of the dust of Jesus' remains.
You know so long as Soros, AFL-CIO, David Brock, NYT editorial board, and the children of ACORN have convinced you that Obama is for you, their work is done.
(The boogeyman game can be played both ways)
If he doesn't build cabinets for uber rich guys, then I bet he builds cabinets for guys who do work for uber rich guys. Those uber rich guys pay them cash for their labor commodity, which in turn is used to purchase Karl's labor commodity.
I work for an insanely rich guy. His net worth was about $35mil this year. He provides me a great living in return for my labor commodity. (Along with 5000 other employees - his company started with like 20, back in 1996 btw)
My Dad was a construction worker - built the DC metro, then sold life insurance door to door during the doldrums of the 70's recession after he graduated from a fine school with a great liberal arts degree. He ended up becoming the executive vice president of the largest custom home builder in America - by selling homes to mostly uber-rich people. He employed thousands of workers to get this done, and in the process, provided his family a great living.
Liberals hate the term
trickle down
economics - as well they should. The mainstream media has led you to believe that all of the rich people take their dollar beels and stuff them under their mattresses, or shred them into confetti for some extravagant display of their wealth at a friend's dinner party. I don't know for sure what this view of wealth and economics is based on, but I have a good feeling that its motivated by jealousy.
people are equal. Ideas are not. Don't confuse them
Damn Tad, I'll bet you're a lovely shade of purple at the moment.
Calm down and spend a few moments in supplication to those wonderful people to whom you owe your humble existence.
How is any of this drivel helping Rick get his SPAM problem solved?
Y'all have a place for this crap.
Between these rants and the SPAM, Catsailor has become a vast wasteland of uninteresting and divisive conjecture.
Mary must not be checking in very much anymore.
<img src="<>/frown.gif" alt="frown" title="frown" height="15" width="15" />
hyp·o·crit·i·cal
Calm down and spend a few moments in supplication to those wonderful people to whom you owe your humble existence.
Actually Pete, I'm quite pleased at the moment - especially with my
humble
experience.
As for spending time worshipping those who I
owe
my living - You seem to not understand something which I will explain -
I owe them nothing other than that which they pay for. They pay for my labor commodity on weekdays between 9 to 5. Sometimes the weekends and sometimes late at night. That is the nature of the contract that I have with my employer. Its no different than purchasing a car or a house, or a washing machine. Its an agreement between two willing parties where both end up getting what they want. My employer wants my labor commodity, and I want compensation for such. If either of us become unsatisfied with the terms of the agreement, we are free to terminate our business relationship and seek other arrangements which may be more beneficial to either party.
There's no supplication or idolatry required.
If he doesn't build cabinets for uber rich guys, then I bet he builds cabinets for guys who do work for uber rich guys. Those uber rich guys pay them cash for their labor commodity, which in turn is used to purchase Karl's labor commodity.
I work for an insanely rich guy. His net worth was about $35mil this year. He provides me a great living in return for my labor commodity. (Along with 5000 other employees - his company started with like 20, back in 1996 btw)
My Dad was a construction worker - built the DC metro, then sold life insurance door to door during the doldrums of the 70's recession after he graduated from a fine school with a great liberal arts degree. He ended up becoming the executive vice president of the largest custom home builder in America - by selling homes to mostly uber-rich people. He employed thousands of workers to get this done, and in the process, provided his family a great living.
Liberals hate the term
trickle down
economics - as well they should. The mainstream media has led you to believe that all of the rich people take their dollar beels and stuff them under their mattresses, or shred them into confetti for some extravagant display of their wealth at a friend's dinner party. I don't know for sure what this view of wealth and economics is based on, but I have a good feeling that its motivated by jealousy.
You kinda make the liberal's point with the bit I highlighted above.
If you have a fire that heavily damages a forest (or a financial melt down that damages the economy), the forest doesn't get healthy again by making the big trees bigger. Oh, the big trees would like everyone to think so now that there is less competition - but it's the little trees (small business) that revitalize the forest. The small businesses in this country are capable of some really smart innovation if they can keep getting some daylight.
And as to your last point, the truth is that middle and lower income people inject a SIGNIFICANTLY larger percentage of their income back into the economy that the rich elite.
IBM built the entire system, Gates (et al)only created the operating system (DOS = DUMB operating system)
Gates was brilliant and lucky that IBM went along with it, and they (MS) kept the licensing rights.... and leased it to IBM
If he doesn't build cabinets for uber rich guys, then I bet he builds cabinets for guys who do work for uber rich guys. Those uber rich guys pay them cash for their labor commodity, which in turn is used to purchase Karl's labor commodity.
I work for an insanely rich guy. His net worth was about $35mil this year. He provides me a great living in return for my labor commodity. (Along with 5000 other employees - his company started with like 20, back in 1996 btw)
My Dad was a construction worker - built the DC metro, then sold life insurance door to door during the doldrums of the 70's recession after he graduated from a fine school with a great liberal arts degree. He ended up becoming the executive vice president of the largest custom home builder in America - by selling homes to mostly uber-rich people. He employed thousands of workers to get this done, and in the process, provided his family a great living.
Liberals hate the term
trickle down
economics - as well they should. The mainstream media has led you to believe that all of the rich people take their dollar beels and stuff them under their mattresses, or shred them into confetti for some extravagant display of their wealth at a friend's dinner party. I don't know for sure what this view of wealth and economics is based on, but I have a good feeling that its motivated by jealousy.
You kinda make the liberal's point with the bit I highlighted above.
If you have a fire that heavily damages a forest (or a financial melt down that damages the economy), the forest doesn't get healthy again by making the big trees bigger. Oh, the big trees would like everyone to think so now that there is less competition - but it's the little trees (small business) that revitalize the forest. The small businesses in this country are capable of some really smart innovation if they can keep getting some daylight.
And as to your last point, the truth is that middle and lower income people inject a SIGNIFICANTLY larger percentage of their income back into the economy that the rich elite.
You'll notice I did not drag you into this, you found it all by yourself. <img src="<>/laugh.gif" alt="laugh" title="laugh" height="15" width="15" />
So now we're talking about logging and de-forrestation? I don't get it.