Post Your Favorite Shark picture- and tell why
Here is one my favorites
<img src="http:/
I love this photo because of what it doesn't show- the rest of the fleet waiting for Dawn and I to finish!
There has been discussion at the meetings of ways to modernize the Shark- Flathead main and raked spreaders top the list. I think it would b e fun to try, but there is a greater concern of keeping the purity of the class.
Even with the classic set up we are able to pull a water skier.
I am hoping to get the pictures of that from John Rogers
I know when I was in the class it was like pulling teeth to make ANY changes. Did manage to get a loose-footed sail and remove the splash rails, which were huge improvements in performance.
The spreader issue and square-head mainsail would not be a huge investment for owners and would make the sail much more versatile. And, with the raked spreaders you can then really tighten up the diamond wires which will lessen the chance of broken masts. Tight wires prebend the mast on its major aaxis, rather than its minor axis. Most masts break on the minor axis.
RIck
The hulls have plenty of volume and with that beam, why the hell not??
Rick nailed it for why the swept spreaders are the best way to go.
A modern rig would really crank up a Shark AND with a high aspect, squaretop main on a pre-bent mast, you have a more forgiving rig in heavy as well as being faster in all conditions. Twist is fast!
Throw on a downwind sail and fly a hull off the wind too!
They are allow to double trap, I believe, but rarely see a single trap.
Actually, a square head mainsail, no matter the material would be good. Seems the Pentex and mylar are not much different in price than the Dacron.
Problem with aluminum for poles is they come in 12' then 24' section. Personally, I think a 20' boat needs a 15' pole to be effective. In that case, alum costs more than carbon or fiberglass.. Easy enough to get an old windsurfer mast
- 57 Forums
- 31.6 K Topics
- 345.9 K Posts
- 4,365 Online
- 31.1 K Members
